Mayan perspectives on 2012

topic posted Mon, April 3, 2006 - 10:21 AM by  Robert
Share/Save/Bookmark
Advertisement
Somebody sent me the 2012 thread that began with an article in which I'm mentioned.
You may be interested in the following page of exclusively Mayan perspectives on the 2012 date:
www.stetson.edu/~rsitler/O...ujB'ak'tun/
Any comments or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
bob
posted by:
Robert
Florida
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • Unsu...
     

    Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

    Mon, April 3, 2006 - 10:39 AM
    It kind of saddens me that the Maya hardly ever come up in conversation around here....a bunch of western new agers with their speculation that isnt grounded in the tradition that gives us the actual date.
    • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

      Mon, April 3, 2006 - 12:03 PM
      hey indu...simmer, just simmer my friend...I am way deep southern culture and borderline redneck....there's some seroiusly skewed up people in the eastern area's of the world...but that's not for me to judge.....isn't everyone screwed up in some way or another...come on, I know I'm not the only one..here... I'm all about the south..and yes I have a confederate flag tatooted on the small of my back...."Bike Toberfest..Daytona" fun, fun...
      anyway.....we are the most picked on in misrepesented ...Thanks to jerry...scouts and tornado's reporters in trailer parks...here in these United States...and I'm not complaining about anyone else......please love and all that jazz....remember...and cigs....judge lest he be judged......
      love life.....yeah..right ..whatever....!!
      • Unsu...
         

        Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

        Mon, April 3, 2006 - 12:39 PM
        Nothing wrong with being a newager, but it seems kind of like we borrowed the year of 2012 from the Maya, then applied everything we know about western astrology, and completely ingored the teachings of the Mayan themselves.

        I would have thought that a 2012 tribe would have alot more conversation about Galatic signitures, Mayan Religion, Mayan Prophecies, and things that generaly relate to the Maya...but instead we find people with almost no cultural or religious understanding of the Maya applying their western (Even western occult/spiritual) ideas to a distinctly Mayan subject.

        While I do respect everybodies opinion, I feel we should shift our focus away from trying to fit 2012 into western traditions, and look a little more deeply into the culture this subject is rooted in.
        • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

          Mon, April 3, 2006 - 12:59 PM
          but thats how we learn to understand ain't it? or is it a strictly isolated mayan phenomena are you sayin?
          • Unsu...
             

            Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

            Mon, April 3, 2006 - 1:06 PM
            The 2012 date is in fact a strictly Mayan and Meso-American phenomanon. There is no other culture that I know of that gives the date of Winter Solstice 2012 any specific meaning. Its purely a Mayan idea, though we dont hear much about them in the 2012 tribe.

            Not that anybody is bad, but I wish we had more experts who actualy studied with the Mayan, and are not just pulling these ideas out of thin air, or other non related sources.

            I lived with the Maya for a while, but my grasp of the language was limited.
            • Unsu...
               

              Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

              Mon, April 3, 2006 - 1:08 PM
              The winter solstice of the year 2012 in the northern hemisphere will mark the culmination of a cycle spanning 1,872,000 days (approximately 5125 years) in the Mayan calendar known as the Long Count*. Maya used the Long Count calendar during what scholars call the Classic Period of their culture, which lasted from roughly 250-900 C.E. In fact, use of this calendar on the ancient Mayan stone monuments literally defines the Classic Period. The 21 December 2012 date simply marks the last day of the current b’ak'tun cycle, a period of 144,000 days (approximately 394 years). More significantly, it marks the end of the thirteenth b’ak'tun cycle, the culminating period of a far larger calendar cycle that began on 11 August of 3114 B.C.E. and that will come to fruition on the 2012 winter solstice.
              In spite of a general lack of familiarity with Mayan culture outside of the Mayan homeland in Guatemala, Mexico and Belize, several hundred Internet websites in numerous languages and a growing corpus of books already focus on the 2012 subject. Until recently, Maya themselves have contributed relatively little to the 2012 phenomenon since only a small number have had any prior exposure to the topic. The Long Count calendar fell into disuse well before the invasion of the Spanish conquistadors and knowledge of its rediscovery by Western academics has reached few of today’s Maya apart from the most educated. The purpose of this website is to serve as resource for those seeking information related to this subject that comes exclusively from within the Mayan cultural context.


              I like this website.
            • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

              Mon, April 3, 2006 - 2:31 PM
              "The end of the world is going to arrive in the year 2000 and bit more, but no one know how much a bit is. It might be 30 years or a century, nobody knows when it will be.... The legend used to say that in Chan Santa Cruz there would arrive a time in which four white ropes would cross; these ropes are the highways to Merida, Vallodolid, Cancun and Vigia Chico. These ropes are a sign that time is going to change; or perhaps that time already changed. When times change, a new war is also near.... The war to come will begin far away and will end here, but before it begins there will be several signs."

              That ain't 2012 though. I thought that date was mr votans configuring.
              • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

                Mon, April 3, 2006 - 11:17 PM
                right on the money!! chontler...really makin' my tummy tingle.....sweet...so very sweet......
                btw.....we never stopped changing...everything has been in a constant state change since the beginning of this existance.....and it's only just begun.....wow......you aint seen nothin' yet...!!...it's going to blow your mind......!!!
                • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

                  Mon, April 3, 2006 - 11:54 PM
                  i think i caught donnas pms! i was craving chocolate and found myself in front of the ben and jerry's, yet the haagen dazs was on sale, groovetime! so i browsed and guess whats new on the market?! (and omg, is it delish!) Mayan Chocolate! youy must know how odd it is to be reading all this maya maya maya and then head out to a lonely small town store to find this! its odd too because i've got all this organic mayan chocolatl in my fridge too. where is this stuff coming from!! i think there must be something conspiring above my head?? we'll just call it coincidence even though i have little to no belief in that, just for fun! yummm! and now--

                  "12/21/2012, if we analyze the counting up of the numerals of this date, gives us a Cabalistic number that is 11. Within metaphysics, this number represents the world of the ascended masters. If we look at the Popul Wuh, we can realize that three eras existed: the era of the gods, the era of the heroes and the era of humans where the decline began. But what's going on? What is happening is that within Mayan prophecies, it makes visible the return to power. The curious thing is that within the awaited time, one also sees the awakending of the Mayan world in its complexity. One can see that we face the appearance of ascended Maya spirits who will come to raise up the people. The famous passage "May no one be left behind" and also the phrase "We always return from where we came." It means that we face great changes, great powers that never have been seen on the face of the earth." Kaqchikel daykeeper Baldomero Kawoq Cuma (2005)

                  now tell me, is this daykeeper a qabalist? if so, then no wonder...

                  if so, then i am really enjoying this ride! its no wonder the spanish and the indios have been cross breeding for some time now. we seem to be resurrecting ourselves, reconsiling differences by generation and re-generation. i wonder, do the maya reject christianity? it seems to parallel quite nicely in the grand scheme of things. doesn't it? christacoatl anyone?





                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.

                    Christacoatl

                    Tue, April 4, 2006 - 10:00 AM
                    that's a good one Anistara!

                    I don't personally have much to say regarding the qabbalistic/maya relationship, or christian/maya tensions and love affairs...a bit out of my range of knowledge...

                    but I did enjoy your synchronistic fiesta there with the mayan chocolate ice cream...humorously I thought that to keep with the impetus of this thread...maybe it's not legit unless the maya elders churned it themselves!! :+) as Davi would say, snarksnark

                    so it is PMS gals?? or is there some shit kicking transit going on that's got all of us ladies in the throes and angst of the 'ole body processing mechanism...'cause lots of my women friends reporting heavy duty physical symptoms this week, to go along with lots of emotional challenges to deal with...
                    • Re: Christacoatl

                      Tue, April 4, 2006 - 11:20 AM
                      ditto....that's weird...painful...very, very, very, painful...god bless midol extra strenght....
                      lot's of changes are happening..I can feel it
          • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

            Mon, April 3, 2006 - 1:14 PM
            new-ager....why in hell do people have to label themselves......man I'm good with just bein' old age southern white kracker.......and yes I'm proud of it.....but to stipulate a certain mind set is the makings of third-world mind control tactis the government/religion base organizations use....to stop the process of human evolution.......the farther down you push them....they easier they are to control and brainwash.......say NO to bio-chips....oooohhhhoooohh......if ya got one stay away from me.......it's that gps marked stuff that makes me queezy in stomach.....they will hunt you down like a hummer.................on grand thief auto.....see ya.......gotta go paint my cave....hey can radar penitrate solid rock several mile thick......they are that smart yet are they..?...
            • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

              Mon, April 3, 2006 - 1:17 PM
              **aren't....
              • Unsu...
                 

                Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

                Mon, April 3, 2006 - 1:32 PM
                Sorry if I offended.

                Anyway, I would like to hear more about what the Maya themselves say about this date that was predicted in their own Calander...what explainations they have for why the Calander ends.
                • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

                  Mon, April 3, 2006 - 2:04 PM
                  hey indu...sorry..I need to take a midol..I can't wait till I'm 50..well if I make it that far..lol..
                  It's the pms talkin...i'm just going to shut up for a while.......I am a women...can I use that excuse??....well anyway...I'm just frustrated....got loads to tell ya....my brain just hurts right now......and this freakin hormonal BS....I don't like not being in complete control of the chemical and biological actions within....I'm workin on it though...two more days and i'll be nice again......i promise....
              • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

                Mon, April 3, 2006 - 2:22 PM
                yup, they sho are. you ain't gonna hide nowhere if they want what you got inside donna.

                'specially if you start blubbing like it seems you wanna so much. you given up on the forests now, huh?

                rumours of tunnels under the salt lakes maybe deep enough
                • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

                  Mon, April 3, 2006 - 11:12 PM
                  chontler...give up...what....?.....what am I giving up?...not possible give something up that's going to be there no matter what...I expcept it...I don't fear it....I like response...nice...
  • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

    Mon, April 3, 2006 - 3:58 PM
    Well, the 2012 "end date" is one that has been determined on the basis of what's called the Long Count, a method of counting dates within a cycle of 1,872,000 days using units of b'ak'tun (144,000 days), k'atun (7200 days), tun (360), uinal (20 days), and k'in (1 day).

    According to current knowledge, the last Long Count date (10.4.0.0.0) was recorded at the site of Toniná, Chiapas in AD 909. This calendrical system was apparently forgotten by the Mayas long before the Spanish Conquest and was not rediscovered until the 1890s when J.T. Goodman, an American journalist in San Francisco, figured out how the ancient Maya calendar worked and how to correlate it with the Gregorian calendar.

    It was not until fairly recently that the living descendants of the ancient Maya learned how to use the Long Count.

    The 2012 date corresponds to 13.0.0.0.0 in the Long Count.

    You can learn more about how the ancient Maya calendar worked at:

    www.michielb.nl/maya/calendar.html
    • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

      Mon, April 3, 2006 - 4:30 PM
      there are two long-count dates on pg 24 of the post-classic Dresden Codex
      although these dates (9.9.16.0.0. and 9.9.9.16.0.) fall in classic times, I find it doubtful that the scribes were ignorant of what they were recording... Hu knows
      • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

        Mon, April 3, 2006 - 4:42 PM
        then again, keeping with ferrara's recent burroughs post

        "I have explained that the Mayan control system depends on the calendar and the codices which contain symbols representing all states of thought and feeling possible to human animals living under such limited circumstances—These are the instruments with which they rotate and control units of thought—I found out also that the priests themselves do not understand exactly how the system works and that I undoubtedly knew more about it than they did as a result of my intensive training and studies—The technicians who had devised the control system had died out and the present line of priests were in the position of some one who knows what buttons to push in order to set a machine in motion, but would have no idea how to fix that machine if it broke down, or to construct another if the machine were destroyed—If I could gain access to the codices and mix the sound and image track the priests would go on pressing the old buttons with unexpected results—" ....
        -from 'The Soft Machine

        oh, the Dresden Codex is supposed to have been created between the 14th and early 16th centuries

        peace
      • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

        Mon, April 3, 2006 - 5:11 PM
        I would not be surprised at all if there were Postclassic scribes who knew about the existence of the Long Count. My point was that there is little evidence that this system was in continuous use by the Maya from ancient times to the present day.
        • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

          Mon, April 3, 2006 - 6:06 PM
          what more could you want to talk about regarding 2012? i say, its still westen civilization, or is it southern? the mayans know whats what. they knew people would come. the maya and many other indigenous cultures used to spend a lot of time together, trading goods and wives and such, equally, knowledge. you can't learn to be mayan, i also feel that the date was put out there for the world to speculate and ponder. naturally. it has many connotations and i feel that if they wanted us to know the end all of it, they'd go on the tv and express it fully. but they don't. however, if you live in arizona or california, you could go to traditional native gatherings and find some mayans there, who will talk to you, in english. and no, none of them have books on the subject, nor do they have anything to give you, or sell you. you need to figure it out, its a lesson in turn. another way would to submerge yourself in the culture, other than that, its purely academic (non-traditional) or metaphysical as far as learning from the maya. oh, this stuff is fun actually, and i truly recommend being around american maya, or as they say, you-a.
          in'lekeshy!
          • Unsu...
             

            Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

            Mon, April 3, 2006 - 6:48 PM
            Well....its west of western civiliazation, and east of eastern civiliazation...my point is that the calander is not specificly tied into anything that the "western hermetic" mystery schools have to teach. Comparitive philosophy I feel is totaly on topic and fair to post in this tribe, but I realy wish we would post more about Maya beliefs, so at least we knew more about what we are comparing to. Maybe there are some more Mayan related posts way farther back.

            The Maya dont live around California and Arizona. Those are the Aztecs and some other mesa tribes like the Hopi and Dineh. The Maya are mostly in Southern Mexico and all of Guatemala. I lived there for a while. Some in Nicaraugua, not so many by the time you get twards Costa Rica...Costa Rica is almost entirely spanish and European.

            I think the date wasnt just put there for us to speculate. I think its the end of the long count.

            Im facinated by the Maya Astrology, and would like to learn more about the astrology for that date.
            • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

              Mon, April 3, 2006 - 7:17 PM
              the borders are imaginary. your belief that there are no maya in the aztec regions is like jail. i know 3 mayan elders who live in california. i am from an uto-aztec tribe in california, these mayans have homes in both local, can you believe it? also, there is a bridge to look at between the indigenous people. its not one thing or the other, its a network of societies, this one bing similar to "them" as the kogi would have it, we are younger brother. a danger in all respects to their civiliation. you want to talk about another cultures beliefs? that is varied, just like any culture. you want to talk to mayan elders about their knowledge, you'll have to go to one, they arn't looking for you if you know what i mean. also, the bridge betwen the hopi and the maya and the rest of the peoples who are fulfilling a specific prophecy, they are tight knit. again, you'd have to go talk to one of "them", you prolly won't find them on the forums. so you're left with this pretty much. why don't you discuss their beliefs? what did you learn from them while living with them? and have you ever seen the movie "dead man"? if not, i am prescribing it to all yous... (stupid white man! heh!)
            • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

              Mon, April 3, 2006 - 7:48 PM
              > The Maya dont live around California and Arizona.

              That's a bit like saying the Jews don't live in Brooklyn!
              • Unsu...
                 

                Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

                Tue, April 4, 2006 - 12:37 AM
                Well...I suppose Maya like anybody else can live anywhere. I am unaware however of any traditional mayan communities that exist inside of the US that resemble anything like the Mayan villages of lake Atitlan or others.

                The Maya did not historicly live in California, but I am certain that there are small groups of families who migrated. That was never my point, and you have to take my words as being excessivly literal to make that point. I am unaware of any mayan villages or sizeable communities inside the US.

                Still, if there were large scale mayan communtities in the US, I still believe that we should be learning about the calander from the maya directly, rather then from people with limited to non-existant knowledge of the Maya applying western astrological and other ideas to the mayan system.

                I dont personaly know nearly as much as I would like to, but I am extreamly curious about the authentic tradition, and at times gets frustrated with the amount of material written by people who have have not done the research into the authentic ancient teachings of the mayan people.
                • Unsu...
                   

                  Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

                  Tue, April 4, 2006 - 12:39 AM
                  And I have spent conciderable time in Costa Rica...Almost everybody I met was Spanish or European...unlike Guatemala which was a clear majority Mayan.

                  I dont mean to say there are a total of 0 mayan people in guatemala, just that they are rare compared to the regions of Guetemala and southern mexico.
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
                    Unsu...
                     

                    Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

                    Tue, April 4, 2006 - 12:59 AM
                    I have some Lakota and Toltec blood.
                    • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

                      Tue, April 4, 2006 - 3:16 PM
                      I wasn't aware that a Toltec genetic group had been identified. The Precolumbian Toltecs were undoubtedly a highly diverse group, as were the Teotihuacanos before them. Since Toltec is not a linguistic term, you may want to try and pin this ancestry down a bit tighter. Someday soon, we'll have a much better grasp on DNA patterns within Mesoamerica. Then you'll know even better what kind of "blood" you've got.
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.

                    Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

                    Tue, April 4, 2006 - 3:11 PM
                    Well, Costa Rica is a complicated case. There are several traditional ingenous communities where people still speak Chibchan languages, but these tend to be visited by outsiders even less frequently than the Indian reservations without casinos in the U.S.

                    Recent genetic studies have shown that a much higher percentage of Costa Ricans have indigenous ancestry than their own oral traditions admit. For the data, see:

                    Barrantes, R. and B. Morera (1999) Contribución del genomo amerindio en la formación de la población costarricense. Vínculos 24(1-2):85-94.

                    Costa Rica's indigenous populations have, like most groups, a sad history. They gave Columbus and his crew a warm welcome in 1504, only to be rejected, insulted, and later attacked. There were multiple Spanish visits up through the early 1620s, but it took much longer for the conquistadors to establish a permanent colony given the dispersed nature of the population and their hostile response to domination. The ferocity of the indigenous resistance was met with brutal repression and genocide. When it was finally possible to "pacify" the native people and establish missions, the Catholic church supported a systematic process of removing indigenous children from their homes, relocating them to mission settlements, forcing them to speak Spanish, and teaching them a Europeanized culture. This is how it started.

                    Later, in the late 19th century, Minor Keith and the United Fruit Company took over vast areas of indigenous land in order to plant bananas. There was a continued resistance by the native people, but eventually they lost out. The United Fruit Company then promoted the "white myth" of Costa Rica, asserting that--unlike neighboring Nicaragua and Panama--it had a predominantly European population.

                    There is a tremendous amount of disinformation about Costa Rica's indigenous heritage. Just last month, I found a historical blurb in an Information Please almanac that repeated the myth that Costa Rica's indigenous population at the time of the arrival of the Spanish was only 28,000 people. Historians and anthropologists now feel that the number was actually closer to 400,000. I contacted the almanac people, and they agreed to change the erroneous text.

                    Dig a little bit, and you'll discover the depth of the problem.
                • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

                  Tue, April 4, 2006 - 3:13 PM
                  > I am certain that there are small groups of families who migrated.

                  I was, of course, referring to recent migrations. There are probably tens of thousands of Central Americans living in California today, a significant percentage of whom have Maya ancestry (whether they know it or not).
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
                    Unsu...
                     

                    Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

                    Tue, April 4, 2006 - 4:05 PM
                    There are no Mayan communities of significant size in the US. Just individuals who moved away from their homeland. I have no doubt some Mayan people moved up to Northern mexico, but there are no distinct traditional Mayan communities, reservations, or villages that are specificly Mayan in the same sense that there are distinctly Mayan villages in Guatemala.

                    Anyway, the Toltec people were invaded by the Aztecs..they existed as a subculture within Aztec society, mixed genetics with the Aztecs and other tribes, and became more of a secretive sub-culture bassed more on philosophy and religion then DNA. I suppose that means I am a mix mash of European, Lokota, and various tribes of Northern Mexico, southwestern US.


                    • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

                      Tue, April 4, 2006 - 5:44 PM
                      I don't know what you mean by "significant size," but I'll bet you would be surprised at the number of informal networks of Mayas from Chiapas and Guatemala that exist within the larger Hispanic communities of San Diego, Los Angeles, and other cities in California, not to mention Chicago, New York, Boston, Dallas, Oklahoma City, etc. Mayas rarely move as "just individuals" and usually function within extended family and social networks.

                      With just a little bit of googling, I even found one community of Guatemalan Mayas in Nebraska:

                      www.ixim.org

                      Here's an organization in Los Angeles that serves over 200 Mayan families:

                      www.7genfund.org/aff-may-vis.html

                      Here are a couple of books about Mayan communities in different parts of the U.S.:

                      Houston, Texas - www.amazon.com/gp/product/1566392578
                      Morganton, North Carolina - www.amazon.com/gp/product/0807827746

                      I don't know who you're calling Toltecs that were "invaded" by the Aztecs. Do you mean the non-Mexica populations that lived around Lake Texcoco?
                      • Unsu...
                         

                        Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

                        Tue, April 4, 2006 - 7:01 PM
                        I did not have any knowledge of these organizations befor you posted this link. However, these are not what I would concider traditional Mayan communities. 200 families scattered througout a city the size of San Diego or Los Angeles is not what I would concider a traditional mayan community. I do think its very cool however that these refugees have an organization like that to keep in touch with their roots the best that they can. I understand what you are saying, but I also understand that it becomes increasingly difficult to have a clear perspective of your culture after several generations of living in the US, the land of forgetfullness. The other link you posted was a Catholic outreach group that serves to build networks with mayan people...most Mayans today are Catholic.

                        I understand what you are saying, but that isnt what I meant.

                        Also, I dont entirely see how the fact that some Mayans moved from Guatemala to the US is relevant as far as justifying new age interpretations of the Mayan religion. If 200 families moved from Guatemala to the US, and have some semblance of a community network while living in a huge industrial city, I dont see how that changes the fact that I am more interested in learning about what the traditional Maya have to say about the significance of 2012.
                        • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

                          Tue, April 4, 2006 - 7:51 PM
                          wow, how is it your inclination to decide whether or not these people are traditional? it seems to me what you are lookng for is not to be found. i spoke with an elder this morning about these issues. how do you understand what clarity of perception a culture hjas after several generations? we evolve, we don't live in huts anymore, there are villages that you foreigners can go visit as students, but that clearly a perspective, and they have one too, of you. you talk about the mayan and other cultures as if they are animals, or speciman. i'm not offended so much as i realize there is a lot of work ahead. according to the traditional maya, the uto-azteca language bases are also maya. you may or may not find this in a book or online, but you can ask them yourself, there might be a family near you. i really don't think you understand clearly. we'll chalk it up to ethnocentricity.
                          • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

                            Tue, April 4, 2006 - 8:25 PM
                            > you can ask them yourself, there might be a family near you

                            There are Mayans everywhere today. The a pattern has some similarity to the Jewish diaspora (especially given that both groups have been the targets of repeated episodes of genocide and forced acculturation). I like to think that, just as St. Patrick's Day has become a national holiday for celebrating "Irish" identity, there will someday be national festivals in the U.S. for celebrating "Maya" identity. (However, like St. Patrick's Day, these are more likely to be tied to events on the Catholic calendar than the Maya calendar.)

                            Language is a powerful cultural tradition. While very few people of Irish ethnicity in the U.S. still speak Gaelic, and Yiddish is fading fast among Jewish communities, most of the Mayas in the U.S. speak Quiché, Cakchiquel, or some other Mayan language (with many of them speaking Spanish as a *second* language and English as a third).

                            Go hang out at your nearest Centro and you may meet some "real" Mayas, but the best way to find them is to hang out with tomato packers, chicken pluckers, house roofers, dishwashers, lawn mowers, bed makers, and toilet scrubbers. They are all around you. Give them a little more time and they'll be your artists, poets, doctors, lawyers, teachers, businessmen, and politicians.

                            Success is a very ancient Maya tradition, and we know how smart they can be, right? Maybe what's coming for the Mayas is the "new beginning" their ancestors foresaw. Where better for it to dawn than in the U.S.?
                        • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

                          Tue, April 4, 2006 - 8:00 PM
                          My mistake. I thought you were referring to Mayan communities in general, not just "traditional" Mayan communities.

                          What do you consider to be a "traditional" Maya community? One in which Mayan languages are still spoken? (That would apply to the ones in Houston, North Carolina, and elsewhere.) One that is not Catholic? (I don't think there are any, except for the evangelical Protestant ones.) One in which there is still a survival of some Precolumbian practices? The latter exist throughout the Yucatan and into highland Guatemala, but every one is a synchretistic blend of indigenous and Christian beliefs (much like the survival of pagan deities in the pantheon of Catholic saints).

                          My own feeling is that your quest for a "traditional" Maya perspective is quixotic. It's really not very different from a romantic fascination with "authentic" Native American culture rather than the reality of reservations, casinos, reparations, and affirmative action. The Mayas have been affected by the heavy hands of many episodes of genocide and missionization (now including groups like Mormons and Jehovah's Witnesses). What is "traditional" and what is "authentic" are now very different things.

                          The idea that 2012 represents something significant is the result of a modern re-introduction of a Long Count system that had not been used by anyone for almost a thousand years before it was rediscovered by Western scholars. The ancient Maya calendar is something that, even for the living Maya, is somewhat analogous to Medieval astrology or alchemy. I'm skeptical that you would find any Mayas who had even heard of 2012 before the early 1990s.

                          Asking what "traditional" Maya communities think about 2102 is a bit like asking what "traditional" European communities think about hermeticism or Paracelsus. (And there are plenty of New Age "Old Religion" Europeans who do think about these things a lot!) It's a bit like the zodiac or star charts, except that astrology has had a more-or-less continous practice while the ancient Maya calendar has not.

                          Note that I am NOT saying that 2012 isn't significant for Mayan people today. It's just as significant as other globalized, international ideological and spiritual movements. An interesting question is whether ancient Maya concepts will have any more meaning to living Mayas in 2012 than, say, the Book of Mormon or evangelical Protestantism.

                          > I dont entirely see how the fact that some Mayans moved from Guatemala
                          > to the US is relevant as far as justifying new age interpretations of the Mayan religion.

                          I don't think New Age interpretations of Maya religion need to be "justified." They happen. What's important is that Mayans don't just move from Guatemala to the U.S., they move *between* Guatemala and the U.S. on a regular basis, carrying New Age concepts (and movies like "Apocalypto") from here back there and from there back here. The bottom line tends to be economic: If there's a way to earn money with something, it will happen.

                          What I want to know is how 2012 will affect the chupacabras.
                          • Unsu...
                             

                            Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

                            Tue, April 4, 2006 - 8:13 PM
                            I feel like this entire conversation got side tracked in a debate about wether the 200 families in Los Angeles are a traditional North American community. That was the easy target, but the less important issue. I have to disagree however with your claims that there is no traditional Maya anymore. I lived in Guatemala for a while, and the environment was very diferent. Even my Guatemalan freind in Los Angeles agrees that there are traditional people still living in Guatemala, but not so much in Los Angeles. However, its not the important issue.

                            There is alot of speculation about what 2012 means, but I am more interested in learning about 2012 within the context of the religion and culture from which the idea came from. I feel that you are turning that comment into more then it is.

                            To say that there is no more authentic Mayan culture, and therefor New Age theories about 2012 are as valid as traditional Mayan beliefs is a real strectch of logic from my perspective.

                            From my humble opinion (And dont turn this coment into more then it is), many of the New Age ideas rooted in western thinking of 2012 fall short in depth and understanding when compared to the authentic teachings of the culture from which 2012 came from.

                            You are totaly correct however in saying that a Mayan holy man can live in the US and travel back and forth to Guatemala and Mexico...I agree. Their teachings can be totaly valid.

                            However that was not my point. I could be a non Mayan person for all I care, but I am interested in learning from somebody who has actualy studied the ancient ruins and learned everything they could about the ancient traditional culture....even if they are a white person...so long as they studied the actual Mayan religion, and are not just imposing western ideas into Mayan images. I feel it cheapens the idea when we dont teach it within the conext from which it came from.


                            I hope that clarifies my position. I hope you are not saying I am wrong or bad for holding that preferance.


                            • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

                              Tue, April 4, 2006 - 8:40 PM
                              > many of the New Age ideas rooted in western thinking of 2012 fall short
                              > in depth and understanding when compared to the authentic teachings
                              > of the culture from which 2012 came from

                              One of these "authentic" teachings appears to have been a belief in divine kingship and the ability of specific Maya rulers to practice magic as incarnations of the Maize God. Another was the pervasive practice of bloodletting, especially by piercing one's penis with a sharp obsidian blade or stingray spine. Another was that Maya kings were able to transform themselves into jaguars, eagles, and crocodiles in order to attack the sources of illness. Yet another was participation in the sacred ballgame.

                              I think the ancient Maya would be dismayed to find so little discussion of corn among New Age aficionados of their belief system. They would be puzzled at the lack of bloodletting. They would also be confused at why there is so little discussion about how to cure diseases, both personal and communal. They would wonder at the apparent absence of sorcery and black magic. Most of all, they'd be appalled that none of the New Age shamans are ballplayers.

                              > so long as they studied the actual Mayan religion

                              Do you think it's possible to put a finger on this when describing "actual" Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, or Hinduism is no easy task? Scholars have lots of ideas, but so much was lost that it is likely new speculation will always have a more prominent place in "traditional" Maya religion than any ancient "authentic" practices.
                              • Unsu...
                                 

                                Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

                                Tue, April 4, 2006 - 8:47 PM
                                I dont believe that we have to accept or adopt all those teachings for our own belief system. I also believe that there is plenty of room for debate when it comes to the study of ancient religons and cultures. I like hearing diferent peoples take on it.

                                I do in fact think its interesting to learn about the Mayan Rituals, even the grusome portions of it. That doesnt mean that we need to adopt those practices, but I do think we should have a basic understanding of their cosmology, astrology, and religion. Wether we agree with it or not is not the issue for me. I feel there is wisdom there that can only be understood within the context of a greater set of teachings.

                                Judaism is the same...I dont agree with animal sacrifice for the forgiveness of sins. However, If I am to take a world religions course, I dont want a teacher to omit that fact that it was practiced on the grounds that the idea would be frowned on by many today.

                                It is my subjective preferance that I personaly would like to see more disucusion about Mayan perspectives (Which include many diferent philosophies from diferent regions and tribes within the larger mayan society). It is my subjective preference that we learn about the ancient practices and the Calender, even if its true that I do not agree with all of the practices.
                            • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

                              Tue, April 4, 2006 - 8:47 PM
                              > I hope that clarifies my position. I hope you are not saying I am wrong or bad for
                              > holding that preferance.

                              Not at all! Every religion has a pursuit of orthodoxy and even fundamentalism. This is also true for ancient Maya religion, though the relative lack of "authentic" religious texts may make it difficult to establish something similar to Talmudic academies or even Bible camps.
                              • Unsu...
                                 

                                Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

                                Tue, April 4, 2006 - 9:04 PM
                                See, I respect that you actualy make posts that speak about the Maya...more so then many people in this tribe. I wasnt complaining about you personaly. Just making a general statement that we dont seem to talk about the Maya enough around here, yet talking about the Cabala is on topic, but talking about the environment is somehow "off topic". That is what I was refering to. Simply that 2012 is a Mayan idea, and I would like tohear more about them.

                                I dont think we can know for sure exactly what the Maya believed, and I also think it varried from region to region...from the Kingdoms to the small villages...and at diferent times...However, I am curios to learn as much as I can.

                                Back to my ealier point...I was in Boaders book store not long ago...I found 3 books put out by the same company, whose name I wont mention. One on Shamanism, one on Druidism, and one on Egptian ritual magick....I thumbed through the chapters and to my suprise they all had the same series of ideas, with almost idientical chapters. The same teachings wraped up in diferent costumes....of course one could argue that many religions share the same core teachings....but not like this...not to this extent as was being presented in these books.

                                I wrote down the names and did some research into the authors....they all had a similar background in occult training, and all had a basic lack of understanding about the cultures they were writting about...they we taking an idea they knew something about, and wrapping it up in diferent cloths with diferent archtype symbols from other culture, and selling it as something that it was not.


                                I dont think you for example are guilty of this, but I am concerned about it as a trend.
                                • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

                                  Tue, April 4, 2006 - 9:30 PM
                                  If you're serious about wanting to learn more, buy this book:

                                  www.amazon.com/gp/product/0804748179

                                  Best of all, go for the "buy both now" deal at Amazon and get the "Popol Vuh" too.

                                  If you want a more compact, less expensive treatment of the subject, buy this one:

                                  www.amazon.com/gp/product/0500285055

                                  If you're interested in orthodoxy and authenticity, I'd avoid books like this one:

                                  www.amazon.com/gp/product/1592573924
                                  • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

                                    Tue, April 4, 2006 - 9:55 PM
                                    They would wonder at the apparent absence of sorcery and black magic. Most of all, they'd be appalled that none of the New Age shamans are ballplayers. <<

                                    ya know the dineh are shapeshifters. the hopi are amazing ballplayers. their regalia today is basketball uniforms. they play the dineh all the time. its taken very seriously. i bet theres some gambling going on. they don't have casinos. and indians love to game...

                                    i wonder if they're related to ancient maya?
                                    • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

                                      Tue, April 4, 2006 - 10:17 PM
                                      so i won't hijack your thread too much as you've made your point very clear and i hope you get more responses like hoopes. or maybe he could elaborate more. what significance do you think language plays? and were the maya an entheogenic society back then, whenever we're talking about. (timelines confuse me). their art is trippy, thats why i ask.
                                      • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

                                        Wed, April 5, 2006 - 11:24 AM
                                        The significance of language? Well, as Terence McKenna liked to say, reality is made of it. It's a deep, deep topic. The preservation and promotion of Mayan and other indigenous languages deserves a lot more attention that it's gotten.

                                        > were the maya an entheogenic society back then

                                        Although there's a *lot* of literature on the use of entheogens by South American and non-Maya Mesoamericans (including the Aztecs as well as the living Huichols and Mazatecs), there is not as much on what the Mayas of the Preclassic (1000 BC - AD 200) or Classic period (AD 200 - 900) were up to. There's no question that they used tobacco (Nicotiana rustica), which is still the pre-eminent plant guide favored by shamans throughout the Americas. They undoubtably also used teonanacatl* (Psilocybe mexicana), ololiuqui* (Rivea corymbosa), pipiltzintzinli* (Salvia divinorum), and morning glory (Ipomoea violacea), as well as excretions from the marine toad (Bufo marinus). Theobromine from cacao** (Theobroma cacao) and caffeine, as well as other alkaloids, were also widely consumed. Given the huge number of plants, especially in the tropics, that have been found to contain DMT and other psychoactive molecules, I think it's fair to speculate that the ancient Mayas knew about the properties of many more of these species that we do.

                                        As far as trippy art goes, check out this database of amazing images:

                                        research.famsi.org/kerrmaya.html

                                        These are "rollouts" of paintings on cylindrical vases, but given the combination of images and texts, I like to think that it was the Mayas who invented the art of underground comix and graphic novels!

                                        *These are indigenous words, but not the Mayan terms.
                                        ** A Mayan word.
                                      • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

                                        Wed, April 5, 2006 - 8:01 PM
                                        There was a major article on Maya entheogen use published 32 years ago:

                                        The Influence of Psychotropic Flora and Fauna on Maya Religion [and Comments and Reply]
                                        Marlene Dobkin de Rios, Norman Alger, N. Ross Crumrine, Peter T. Furst, Robert C. Harman, Nicholas M. Hellmuth, Nicholas A. Hopkins, William Clyde King, Joan D. Koss, Weston La Barre, Herbert J. Landar, Joesph K. Long, Tatiana Proskouriakoff, Arthur J. Rubel, Francisco Samaranch, J. Eric S. Thompson, Roger W. Wescott
                                        Current Anthropology, Vol. 15, No. 2 (Jun., 1974) , pp. 147-164

                                        Abstract
                                        An examination of Maya art from southern Mesoamerica shows the following art motifs appearing with some regularity throughout the archaeological record, from Pre-Classic to Post-Conquest times: (a) mushroom stones and mushroom pottery, (b) the frog/toad motif, and (c) the water lily motif. The thesis of this papers is that these flora and fauna represented in art are related to and influenced by the psychotropic properties of the mushroom, toad, and water lily. It is hypothesized that such properties were known to the Maya shaman, priest, and artist as well as being generally diffused at a folk level in Pre-Classic times. The paper examines certain Maya religious beliefs and practices believed to be influenced by and possibly derived from such psychotropic use.
                                    • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

                                      Wed, April 5, 2006 - 11:35 AM
                                      If the Dineh and the Hopi were to study the ancient Maya, or any other Mesoamerican cultures, I think they'd discover that the history of the Spanish Conquest and its aftermath created far more distance between indigenous people in the U.S. and their cousins in Mexico, Central America, and South America than ever existed in ancient times.

                                      According to what I've read, it was Zapotecs from Oaxaca (southern Mexico) who helped teach the Dineh how to weave during the Colonial period. There are also surprising parallels, and perhaps even some historical connections, between Hopi kachinas and the deities of ancient Mesoamerican civilizations. There are many more relationships than most people know about.

                                      The ancient Maya ballgame was almost certainly a betting game as well as an athletic contest.
                                      • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

                                        Wed, April 5, 2006 - 12:37 PM
                                        theres a ballgame court in flagstaff at one of the ruins. there is no good reason for it being there, but its classic.

                                        ithat entheogen list is pretty lengthy. if you've done any few of these, you'd see maya more clearly, though i'm certainly not recommending anyone take drugs, of course.

                                        thanks for cleansing the doors of perception !! ;)
                                        • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

                                          Wed, April 5, 2006 - 4:01 PM
                                          yo Hoopes,

                                          thanks so much for taking the time to open up on all this knowledge you got

                                          good stuff



                                          IA,

                                          maybe you could tell us what sources you have explored on the Maya so we could have a better idea of where you're at and where you might go next

                                          are you more interested in learning the modern-day mayan perspectives, theories on the ancients, or???

                                          as for the books hoopes linked to, def. go with the first over the second. I donno how editions of 'The Ancient Maya' are these days under the new author/editor but the old copy i read (back when it was just Morely) was very very impressive, although a bit too authoritative sounding on specific historical facts which are not factually verifiable...

                                          Coe's book is imho boring and uninspired, tho many will disagree

                                          if you're interested in connections between ancient and modern maya shamanism 'Maya Cosmos: 3000 years on the shaman's path" by Friedel and Schele is a good, actually great, resourse, although it's a bit rambly and lacks continuity
                                          based on the gist i'm getting from you this book will probably satisfy you most

                                          if you wanna know modern maya shamanistic practices check out "Time and The Highland Maya" by Barbara Tedlock

                                          if you want mayan sacred literature start with 'The Popol Vuh' which hoopes mentioned
                                          there's a good translation by Barbara's husband Dennis
                                          whatever translation you get, make sure it's translated direct from quiche and not from spanish, (also some versions of the PV are marketed with whole sections left out)

                                          if you're innarrested in theories about ancient mayan conceptions of the 2012 era (and their entheogenic practices) check out John Major Jenkins' 'Maya Cosmogenesis 2012'. (it may superficially seem too new-agey for your comfort buy i think you'll be impressed by it's authority)
                                          or you could take a shortcut on this and google: 'John Major Jenkins Izapa 2012'

                                          just a suggestion... you may have a better time with the material if you let come what may rather than worrying about its new-ageyness
                                          you're intellegent, analytical and critical, i'm sure you'll sort out the treasure from the trash on your own just fine
                                          you'll do well to forget everything you've read on the internet and approach the books with a clear mind on the topic
                                          afterward you can augment what you've gained from the books with internet research, but i think too many people go in reverse and it warps things a bit

                                          peace be with
                                          • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

                                            Wed, April 5, 2006 - 4:11 PM
                                            Hoopes wrote:
                                            >>>I think the ancient Maya would be dismayed to find so little discussion of corn among New Age aficionados of their belief system. They would be puzzled at the lack of bloodletting. They would also be confused at why there is so little discussion about how to cure diseases, both personal and communal. They would wonder at the apparent absence of sorcery and black magic. Most of all, they'd be appalled that none of the New Age shamans are ballplayers. <<<

                                            if my ego may be allowed some room here,

                                            i'm not sure if i'm percieved as a new ager or wha?... although my status as an aficionado of sorts is inevitable...
                                            i just find it interesting, i'm a farmer... we grow a lot of corn, when i was younger i used to cut myself, in learning to incorporate the mayan energies into my life i experienced a profound physical and psychological healing (no more cutting), and just today after working in the fields i played a game of basketball followed by a game of ... well 'calvin-ball' would be the best way i can explain it hehe....

                                            i'm not into sorcery or black magic... i like science and jesus

                                            it's weird... i'm white as they come, my parents are mostly aspiritual mainstreamers... somehow i'm mayan and i don't even understand how or why or when it happened... it's weird

                                            sorry to interrrupt this thread, I just need someone to tell me i'm a new-age freak to snap me out of it

                                            peace
                                            • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

                                              Wed, April 5, 2006 - 5:26 PM
                                              i'm not into sorcery or black magic... i like science and jesus <<

                                              :)

                                              it's weird... i'm white as they come, my parents are mostly aspiritual mainstreamers... somehow i'm mayan and i don't even understand how or why or when it happened... it's weird <<

                                              this is coming to light here/now. i think you do understand how and why it happened, its wired :)
                                              shifts happen. we are our children. i have a feeling this calender clock cog wheel cycle shifter thing we're doing is intricately interconnected to the draw, especially the ear magic, corny huh?

                                              this is a topic i amn really interested in.
                                              • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

                                                Wed, April 5, 2006 - 6:06 PM
                                                now that i've sufficiently gotten this thread way off topic...

                                                in my artwork there's a lot of references to choclea

                                                i think that's where the dimensional / cosmic / wacky communication comes in

                                                eerie
                                            • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

                                              Wed, April 5, 2006 - 6:24 PM
                                              The cutting is interesting indeed. From what we know about the ancient Maya, cutting was a sacred ritual, practiced in both private and public contexts. There are lots of images of Mayas cutting themselves (just look at the images of "bloodletting" in the database whose link I posted). They would pierce their penises and tongues and dance around in white cloth spattered with blood. Some scholars have noted that significant blood loss can result in the release of endorphins, producing a trance state. (I don't recommend trying it without an experienced guide!!!)

                                              Unfortunately, like the ancient medicines of tobacco and coca (when made into cocaine and crack) and perhaps cannabis as well, in today's world these things often wind up causing more damage than healing. (This also goes for alcohol!) Why is this? Well, probably because the practices and substances have been removed from their original, sacred contexts. It's nice to think that some people will study the old ways and learn how to turn some poisons, addictions, and and obsessions back into medicines and tools. Unfortunately, as has always been true, some people will continue to act stupid (and make things more difficult for everyone else.)

                                              Tobacco, coca, cannabis, and cutting are not bad things. They are just used in bad ways.
                                              • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

                                                Wed, April 5, 2006 - 6:38 PM
                                                yea... experienced guides would probly be much better to go by than pictures of Sid Vicious lol

                                                one crazy thing tho... one was an anarchy sign on my waist
                                                the dreamspell relates the sacral chakra (waist area) to a symbol just like the anarchy sign
                                                i can still barely see the scar (that was about 9 years ago now...)


                                                i'm a nut
                                          • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

                                            Wed, April 5, 2006 - 7:06 PM
                                            Yo TreeFrog. Thanks so much to YOU for opening up on some personal stuff. Nothing beats honesty when it comes to pursuing deep discussions.

                                            Y'all should know that I've been following this stuff for a long time now. I got interested in fantasy literature in a serious way when I was a kid, reading the Hobbit and LOTR for the first time about 1969 and 1970. I think that's when it started. My grandfather was a serious Freemason and my mother a Rosicrucian, so I heard a lot about mysticism and ancient Egypt around the house, which was one of the sources of my interest in archaeology. I think it was 1973 when I read Erich von Daniken's "Chariots of the Gods," which must have been what piqued my interest in the Maya. I first read one of Morley's early editions of "The Ancient Maya" for a paper I wrote in a 10th grade social studies class in 1974, around the same time that I first picked up Carlos Castaneda's "Don Juan: A Yaqui Way of Knowledge," which led to his other books. I got very goth right about then (though it wasn't called that in the 70s!), reading a lot about witchcraft and the occult. In my 11th grade social studies class I wrote a paper on Atlantis, for which I read a bunch of things ranging from Ignatius Donnelly to more recent stuff. It was around that time (1975) that I first picked up Helena Blavatsky's "Isis Unveiled" and other theosophical literature.

                                            Sometime during my Senior year in high school I settled on becoming an archaeologist. My grandparents took me on a trip to visit ancient sites in Mexico during the summer of '76 and that just sealed the deal. To make a long story short, I had already decided to focus on the Mayas and other Mesoamerican cultures by the time I started college. My undergraduate advisor was Michael Coe and in the first course I took from him we used the first edition of his book "The Maya" (now in its 7th edition). I also took courses from George Kubler, a famous art historian who specialized in ancient Mesoamerica. I did my first Central American fieldwork in Costa Rica in 1978 and have specialized in that part of the Americas ever since. I also did a significant amount of dabbling in altered states during that period, in part as a followup to my long-term interest in mystical experiences.

                                            I went on to get a doctoral degree in anthropology, having the great privilege of completing the last Ph.D. directed by the late Gordon Willey, a giant in Maya studies. My dissertation was on the oldest villages and pottery (about 2000 BC) in Central America. I've done a lot of fieldwork and travel in Central and South America, including visits to many ancient sites. I've done a little bit of travel in Nepal, where I developed a strong interest in Tibetan Buddhism. I grew up in a predominantly Jewish neighborhood in Baltimore, so I've also had a lifelong interest in Judaism, which I still find to be more intellectually satisfying than any other traditions I've studied.

                                            Anyway, that's just a *little* bit of where I'm coming from. I've been studying and teaching about the Maya on and off now for over thirty years. There is so much to learn that It still feels as if I've only just begun. I've read all of the books you mentioned. Most of the best stuff that I've found, however, is in scholarly articles.

                                            As far as where I'm going next... Right now I'm working on several different papers on shamanism, sorcery, shape-shifting, healing, and violence in ancient Central America, with a focus on both Mayan and Chibchan peoples. I'm working hard at trying to interpret who made and used ancient art and to understand the origins of priesthoods, prophetic movements, and religious traditions. Two of the books that have influenced my thinking a lot this past year are these:

                                            www.amazon.com/gp/product/0822329883

                                            www.amazon.com/gp/product/0822333457
                                            • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

                                              Wed, April 5, 2006 - 8:50 PM
                                              yo Hoopes,

                                              are you a Bocas dweller? i think I saw you in the Panama tribe
                                              • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

                                                Thu, April 6, 2006 - 7:49 AM
                                                Only in spirit.
                                                • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

                                                  Thu, April 6, 2006 - 8:22 AM
                                                  For an ongoing discussion between Geoff Stray and Robert Sitler who wrote the article that triggered this discussion, see this page : www.diagnosis2012.co.uk/sit.htm
                                                  • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

                                                    Thu, April 6, 2006 - 6:17 PM
                                                    Hoopes,

                                                    what do you think about the idea that originally the imagery of beheadings and stuff was metaphorical and was later used as an excuse to do such things in reality?

                                                    also wanted to mention that idea about the maya being the original underground graphic novelists is one i have come to on my own also ( used to be a comix geek)... William Blake was a big groundbreaker too...

                                                    of interest to hoopes and geoff both:

                                                    hey Geoff glad to see you here. it looks like your site is updated so I'm suprised that i haven't heard back from you on my report 'This is 13 Kan Again' which i e-mailed you news of a while ago now. last we communicated you were eager to read it. the last update of your 'investigating dreamspell' article is not an accurate portrayal of my intentions, which should be obvious if you read the report, so i do hope you'll do me the favor of another update. i'm confident you'll find it interesting reading

                                                    hoopes, i think i cite you in this report, in the section "Character of the Dynasty of Palenque"
                                                    you can find it here: forums.tortuga.com/viewtopic.php

                                                    peace
                                                    • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

                                                      Fri, April 7, 2006 - 5:43 PM
                                                      MASSIVE NEWS: An outcome of the email conversation with Robert Sitler is that a monument from Tortoguero has been confirmed as showing the 2012 end-date. Check here for all links: www.diagnosis2012.co.uk/new9.htm#sit

                                                      Treefrog, I had put a link to your article on the Investigating Dreamspell page, and changed Dreamspell "fraternity" to Planet Art Network, as requested. I have now answered your emails, and removed the paragraph in which I presumed you were implying an involvement of 21 July. I presumed that by mentioning the 2 Ix year, you were referring to the year 1595-1596, which is listed as a 2 Ix year in the Cuceb section of the Chilam Balam of Mani, which Arguelles says the Dreamspell correlation is based on. 21st July was 2 Ix in 1595, the year-bearer for 1595-1596, (coinciding with haab day 0 or1 Pop, depending on interpretation of "the first day of Pop"), and I used the Dreamspell calculator to find that the day 2 Ix would have been 21 July in 1596, in Dreamspell,so, regardless of whether you meant anything about 21st July, the Dreamspell correlation still differs from the Mani correlation.

                                                      Your huge essay will take several hours or even days to absorb and check, and I simply haven't had the spare time yet.

                                                      I fear we have gone off-topic here, sorry, folks.

                                                      Geoff
                                                      • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

                                                        Fri, April 7, 2006 - 6:55 PM
                                                        yea, i figured it'd take a while to digest but i'm confident your questions will be answered once you get the time

                                                        there's more to the dreamspell than you might think... that's why the report is so long... but there's stuff in there that will really amaze you (or not) if you give it time...

                                                        so ya, don't rush it

                                                        thanks again

                                                        peace
                                                      • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

                                                        Sat, April 8, 2006 - 2:00 PM
                                                        > An outcome of the email conversation with Robert Sitler...

                                                        Let's give credit where credit is due. This monument has been known to epigraphers for some time now. (It was first mentioned by Nikolai Grube in one of the notebooks for the Maya hieroglyph workshops at UT-Austin.) The confirmation of the end date is not what's new. Rather, it's the full translation of the accompanying glyphs.
                                                      • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

                                                        Sat, April 8, 2006 - 4:25 PM
                                                        A drawing by Marc Zender of Tortuguero Monument 6 (with the Long Count date 13 B'ak'tun 4 Ajaw 3 Kan'k'in) and a partial translation of "Utam ?? Yem Ta???" was published as Fig. 120 of The Proceedings of the Maya Hieroglyphic Workshop, March 9-10, 2002, University of Texas at Austin, Palenque and Its Neighbors, presented by Nikolai Grube, Simon Martin, and Marc Zender. The transcription of the discussion of this monument (p. 112) says:

                                                        "Let's now finish with a happy text! This is the last passage from Tortuguero Monument 6 (Fig. 120). This text does not refer to the end of the world. It talks about the 13.0.0.0.0 4 Ajaw (O3) 3 K'ank'in (P3) Period Ending (December 10, 2012). This is the end of the 13th b'ahktun which we will see in the year 2012. What will happen? Well, utom, "it will happen" (O4) followed by something that we cannot read (P4) and he "will descend" yem (O5). The last glyph (P5) begins with ta followed by something. However, this is not the end of the world."

                                                        The December 10 date may cause some confusion, since it's different from either December 21 (based on the 584,283 correlation) or Dec. 23 (based on the 584,285 correlation). This is because it's Julian, not Gregorian.
                                                    • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

                                                      Sat, April 8, 2006 - 2:17 PM
                                                      I don't think that the imagery of beheadings began as something metaphorical at all. The tradition of decapitation goes back a long way in South America, with some graphic representations of many trophy heads in stone carvings at Cerro Sechín, in the Casma Valley of Peru, at about 1300 BC:

                                                      www-astronomy.mps.ohio-state.edu/~...ml

                                                      It's difficult to say how much older this practice may be, but there are well-preserved trophy heads from Paracas, on the south coast of Peru, that date to about the same time (ca. 300 BC) as Izapa Stela 21, which has an explicit image of decapitation. Heads were probably rolling all around the Americas at least 3000 years ago.
                                                      • Re: Mayan perspectives on 2012

                                                        Sat, April 8, 2006 - 2:43 PM
                                                        now ive got that darn judas priest (conicidence? j/k!) song stuck in my noggin, some heads are gonna roll...

                                                        it seems entirely possible that metaphors are based on realities. chop chop! POP!

                                                        i hope i'm not interrupting, i am thoroughly enjoying these threads of pass/age.

                                                        piece!

Recent topics in "Year 2012"