Leading New Age Authors Admit They Make Money From Their 2012 Fear Mongering

topic posted Wed, May 21, 2008 - 7:21 AM by  Hoopes
Share/Save/Bookmark
Advertisement
Well, not really. But wouldn't that be nice?

Lawrence Joseph - apocalypse2012.net

John Major Jenkins - www.alignment2012.com

Carl Johan Calleman - www.calleman.com

José Argüelles - www.13moon.com

Barbara Hand Clow - www.handclow2012.com

Geoff Stray - www.diagnosis2012.co.uk
Buy his new "pocket guide" to 2012! - www.lulu.com/content/2279738

At least Daniel Pinchbeck admits he's embracing capitalism:

"We are happy to announce that Reality Sandwich's parent company, Evolver LLC, has received an initial investment."
realitysandwich.com/the_state_sandwich


posted by:
Hoopes
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • ...and the problem is?

    Does 2012 imply chastity and charity?
    • I don't have a problem with it except when they're making money at other people's expense, claiming that hardworking, self-sacrificing, hopelessly dedicated graduate students and professional Maya scholars are all wrong, stupid, or (worse) actively devious and evil.

      I've already fielded two calls this morning from reporters wanting to ask my "expert" opinion on crystal skulls. It's a shame real scientific research rarely excites this kind of interest (or generates so much moolah).

      Sigh.
      • Please pardon but isn't making money inherently at other people's expense?

        I am familiar with some of these writers and they seem like honest interpretations.

        The Mayan Elders will be clarifying these efforts next year.

        Again I ask, ...and the problem is?

        I did note you said 'real scientific research' so I think I have my answer.

        Hmmmm!

        Were you contacted via Tribe or are you just famous somehow?

        Are you aware of the crystal skulls and their efficacy?
        • The crystal skulls are phony. Fear and sensationalism sells a lot better than scientifically based and reasonable material. I think the authors mentioned are all guilty of cashing in on this, which is not to say there is no validity to their works, just that we, as readers, should remain well aware of this conflict going on between the simple truth and the high market value of sensationalist hype.
          • "The crystal skulls are phony."

            Hello Will, can you please verify your statement?
            • "Hello Will, can you please verify your statement?"

              I heard a piece on "All Things Considered" the other day about some of them being analyzed and found to be modern. The wikipedia article is very interesting, imo. I thing "the crystal skulls are phony" is a little harsh and overstated. They are good art nomatter who did them or when.

              I very much wish that we would value such rare and spectacular objects less, and realize the true value, the ancient heritage, and the magical properties of the absolutely amazing skulls we are born with.
              • this raises and interesting question for me. I have seen the British Musuem skull. I think they said on the description that yes they suspected it was a fake, in that it was probably made only about 100 years ago.

                But then this makes me wonder, who made it ? If its about 100 years ago, there wasnt such a new age hoo har as there is now, maybe it was an underground that is connected with the Mayans.

                We dont always have to asume that something has to be ancient to have powers.

                I only say this because when i did see the skull, it seemed to resonate with a strange power to me. Of course some of that could just be in the mind, but i dont know, it didnt feel like it.

                Certainly i have held cyrstals that i clearly felt my energy resonating with, so a crystal so a crystal so large as these skulls, moder or not, is sure to have some kind of properties.

                Havnt read those books so cant make much comment on that ! As to the money thing i think everyone needs money, i dont think any of us on this thread are completly self sufficent. The integriity of your work, and making money are too seprate issues if you ask me, though of course if people are writing rubbish just to make money thats a bit cheap.
              • "I think 'the crystal skulls are phony' is a little harsh and overstated. They are good art no matter who did them or when."

                You know, I feel exactly the same way about crop circles, which are kind of like contemporary crystal skulls. (Though I'm not persuaded that the crystal skulls are "good" art except perhaps in the context of how they're used in "performance".)

                Just as crystal skulls are only "hoaxes" when they're claimed to be ancient, crop circles are only "hoaxes" when they're claimed to have been made by ETs or other-dimensional beings.

                They're all a form of art, which is a magical thing in itself. Especially when art transforms human consciousness for the good.

              • I very much wish that we would value such rare and spectacular objects less, and realize the true value, the ancient heritage, and the magical properties of the absolutely amazing skulls we are born with. <<

                and why aren't their any real indians rallying for these skulls? its all white people!! (or followers thereof!) no one notices the fine details...

                • "and why aren't their any real indians rallying for these skulls? its all white people!! (or followers thereof!) no one notices the fine details... "

                  This is an excellent question (and an important fine detail). However, there are in fact "real Indians" who are rallying for these skulls. One of them is Hunbatz Men, a Yucatec Maya who spent a lot of time hanging out with hippies in the 1970s and has become a spokesperson for New Age mythology.

                  Indians aren't immune from becoming followers of white people's ways (as should be clear from the large numbers of Indians who have been successfully missionized into various Christian traditions).

                  It's important to note that the crystal skulls came into the consciousness of European collectors in the context of the late 19th century, when both spiritualism and racism were significant currents in Victorian worldviews. The high technical skill exhibited by these objects suggested to many that they couldn't possibly have been made with Native technology (as it turns out, they weren't), but must have come from a lost civilization, lost continent, or (more recently) outer space. All of this had a racist ideology at its core.

                  My theory about this--the short and simplified version--is that certain members of the Victorian upper crust saw a glimpse of the future in people like Frederick Douglass and Chief Joseph: They realized, to their horror, that someday people of color (and women of all colors) were going to be writing books, teaching in universities, and leading nations. It wasn't a future they wanted, so they did their best to foster mythologies about how civilization could only have been invented by white Europeans or other white people (such as the residents of imaginary places like Atlantis and Lemuria) and to do their best to undermine every effort by people of color to succeed intellectually and economically. This included inventing new and believable (to some) "histories" of imaginary pasts.

                  The story is actually fairly complex. Mixed in with Victorian racism was a certain degree of nationalism to redress past wrongs, such as Ignatius Donnelly's 1882 retelling of the Atlantis myth (with "scientific" support) in such a way that it bolstered the ethnic identity of Irish immigrants to the U.S., who themselves--although white--had themselves been subjected to vicious ethnic discrimination by people of English ancestry. (This has been revived in the rhetoric of Irish nationalist and Atlantis booster Michael Tsarion, who was born in Belfast.) At the same time that Donnelly was doing this in the U.S., Irish nationalism Annie Besant was promoting both spiritualism and feminism on the other side of the pond.

                  To bring this up to the present, as the likelihood of the reality of Atlantis and Lemuria (so popular among Victorian spiritualists) have diminished in the face of scientific knowledge such as theories of plate tectonics and high-tech detailed mapping and exploration of submarine topography, outer space has become the new Atlantis. The crystal skulls, which a century or more ago were implied to have come from lost continents, are now said to have been made or inspired by aliens. (Or perhaps by Mayas or Toltecs who were nonetheless instructed and/or inspired by aliens.) There is a lingering racism in there that still denies a 100% indigenous ingenuity, which is unfortunate. I think Indians know this, which may explain why the vast majority are not very enthusiastic about crystal skulls.

                  I'm guessing Indiana Jones is not very popular with Indians, except to the extent that he reinforces their own stereotypes of archaeologists as insensitive graverobbers who are out for fame, fortune, and adventure. However, that stereotype is based more on the self-styled bravado of people like F.A. Mitchell-Hedges, one of the "discoverers" of a crystal skull, than on what real archaeologists are really like today:

                  en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitchell-hedges
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
                    i guess i'm asking why indian leaders aren't rallying, you know, following suit. i wouldn't consider hunbatz men an indigenous leader of a nation or a people (of his own). i know indians are new agers too. been there. the thing is, when you start going back and asking the elders (of a variety of tribes and nations, indigenous america(s)) about these things, they won't touch it. its not because they dont know about it, but because they know too much and is often called bad medicine. they could be wrong though. my dad is a big fan of indiana jones, hes knows the difference between hollywood and reality. don't we?
  • I think you're biased and discriminating, Hoopes. Fear mongering has it's own industry; big media (CNN, Fox etc.), Hollywood (Deep Impact and the like), "educational media" (History Channel, Discovery etc.) and of course don't forget about the greatest American president of All Times: George Bush ("Weapons Of Mass Destruction" and "Terrorists" spelled with a German accent).


    Lawrence Joseph is true Roman Catholic who's writing for the New York Times (talk about oxymorons)

    John Major Jenkins is definitely the most intelligent character in the bunch. I actually believe what he talks.

    Carl Johan Calleman is too new agey for me, but his book The Mayan Calendar and the Transformation of Consciousness was a very good read, I really enjoyed that work.

    Jose Arguelles, way, way, way tooo new agey. And the Mayans are not particularly fans of him...

    I'm not familiar with Barbara Hand Clow. Did I miss something?

    Geoff Stray is a cool guy. He's the father of the online 2012 mythos. Good job Geoff!

    I promise I will read a book from Daniel Pinchbeck as soon as it will be available from a library or friend.
    • Unsu...
       
      Barbara Hand Clow is a new age astrologer, and has dipped her fingers in the 2012 circus/merry-go-round. (no rudeness intended!)
      Barbara and her partner operate a publlishing house called BEAR & COMPANY PUBLISHING.
      One of the better known books connected to this publishing house is: The Mayan Oracle- by Ariel Spilsbury & Michael Bryner.


      I'm enjoying this thread. At last I'm seeing some good debate going on here. Diversity stirring the pot...


      Many minds make LIGHT work!

      • Unsu...
         
        one mind
        • Unsu...
           
          Yes ik, I agree with you...ONE mind.

          One mind that has diversified into many minds...( mmm...perhaps ego?)

          One mind. One vision. One journey. One love.
          • So strange to see an assertion that people such as Geoff Stray, Jose Arguelles and John Major Jenkins are 'fear-mongers'. Which part of their writings is 'fear-mongering'?
            To call people like Geoff and John, "New Age Authors" is pathetic and wrong!

            Looks like the pseudo-anthro-archaeo-debunking crew are desperate for something to attack and so stoop to stupid lies and defamation to make their boring point!
            'Oh look someone is making money from selling a book!' - what surely not! You mean that years of research, costs of living, material costs, etc. actually require a return? Shocking!

            It really is beginning to look like cheap jealousy from a failed writer!
            • "Which part of their writings is 'fear-mongering'?"

              Basically, the part about how if we don't change our consciousness to be more like the Mayas are imagined to have been, we're done for.

              That's always struck me as a bit odd, considering how Maya civilization collapsed a thousand years ago and most Mayas today are desperately poor.
              • Unsu...
                 
                hoopes, you should read some of these books.....they may help you if you can open your mind. cant you see the real fear mongering is inside the media like fox news, cnn, cbs, abc? i mean for real, this thread is ridiculous...... some of these people writing these books are trying to better our planet and are helping to co-create peace. i guess you only see what you want to see....i feel bad for you hoopes, here is a big cyber ((((((hug for you )))))))
                • kristaliina what do you make of this skull thing ? Im curious who and why it was made, but when i saw it it certainly seemed to resonate with a power to me, actuly i felt almost frighting, like it contained a power that was intense, but i accept this may have been partly in my head........
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
                    Unsu...
                     
                    i have seen sha na ra bring out some powerful healing in people. it still fascinates me how there are no tool marks on some of the skulls that have been found. i myself had an amazing and inspiring experience..... i also feel that the spirit of the skull however old they are, are guided to those they resonate with. my own opinion is that there will be 13 ancient skulls coming together in egypt for 2012. 12 in a circle with one in the center....the 12 will be facing inward looking at the central skull. these skulls to me are a major part in 2012, spirit has been guiding some to do this for a reason :)
              • Which part of their writings is 'fear-mongering'?"

                Basically, the part about how if we don't change our consciousness to be more like the Mayas are imagined to have been, we're done for.

                That's always struck me as a bit odd, considering how Maya civilization collapsed a thousand years ago and most Mayas today are desperately poor.

                << no comment on this anyone?

                i find it odd too. and sad, and kind of gross. the proceeds are going directly in the mouths of the people they are profiting from? or no? no i think.
                • <<That's always struck me as a bit odd, considering how Maya civilization collapsed a thousand years ago and most Mayas today are desperately poor.

                  << no comment on this anyone? >>


                  don’t forget the Mayans received a very big kick in the balls from the Spanish, but i for one dont think there civilization (the little i know if it ) was all good. But i do think they had a strong connection with the cosmos, a mysterious connection at that, like the Egyptians.

                  Just because a civilisation has good eyesight on the cosmic level does not mean they have great power over the 3D realm. Hell look at George Bush for that, he has lots of power on the 3D realm and zero cosmic eyesight !

                  One of the things that makes me most go for the 2012 argument, (though i DEFINATLY dont think its going to be an end of the world thing, but a key milestone in the changing of our consciousness, is that T Mckenna, the Mayans and the Galaxtic alignment are all happeing on that date, and Mckenna aparantly didnt know about the Mayan stuff at the time. That seems a kind of very very spooky coincidence.

                  as i say, the next 20 years is the crunch time for humanity, its not only the Mayan and Hopi saying this, but also people in suite and tie with Ivey League degrees, like Jeffry Sachs, who's resources and knowledge of global problems are probably second to non.
                • So much daft over-simplification, misrepresentation and lies being used as provocation!

                  No one has suggested that unless we all "change our consciousness to be more like the Mayas are imagined to have been, we're done for."
                  It is the Maya who have been warning, along with Hopi and many others from many tribes and cultures, a similar message. That we need to prepare for the changes at hand, that humanity can survive the changes through stopping arms dealing and wars, drugs, abuse of children and women, abuse of nature and theft of natural resources for profit.

                  Hunbatz Men is being seriously defamed in this thread. He is not just a Maya who hung out with some hippies, he was given alot of teachings by members of his family and others, from a child. He has been lecturing about the cycles, some Mayan esoteric teachings, calendars, symbolic and mantric information, sacred sites and structures, practices and traditions of the ancient Maya, etc. He has written valid information and is not some new age writer. To suggest he is is pure rubbish! Hunbatz can be seen at the councils of Mayan Elders and ceremonies in various areas, and he also helps foreign groups to journey in the Mayalands. He has been a key in bringing together large numbers of people to complete ceremonies of activation in important sites, and was the person who led a group of people to make the first circle of hands around the pyramid of Kukulkan at Chicchen Itza in '95 when the 9 Hell Cycles ended for the Yucatan Maya.
                  Hunbatz is a knowledgable and humble man who deserves more respect from small-time anthro-types. He has facilitated a mysteries school, a Mayan traditional community, conferences and initiations for now thousands of people. he knows, like many others that people return, sometimes after many lives to "do their work, again"

                  It's so funny when you hear very initiated (and keepers of tradition) native peoples and First Nations members when they tell you about what the anthro-types 'know'. Many have said to me something like "the anthropologists and archaeologists came and asked us questions about our culture and we told them anything to make them go away. They know almost nothing about us".

                  The assertion that "most Mayas today are desperately poor." is more of the same misrepresentation of reality. The Maya were subject to mass genocide by the Spanish so any suggestion that they are poor now because of their traditions and knowledge is more cheap nonsense.
                  Up to the point where the Americas were invaded there were still regular meetings of native peoples from all the Americas. Easy transport and communication has meant that many such meetings are being held on a regular basis and the writing and exposing the lies of so many archaeolo-gits and anthropooey-gits.
                  Such lies include the assertion that all native peoples of the Americas came from those who crossed from Siberia, about the Olmec having no metal and tools, about the Maya being focussed upon sacrifice and war, about the reasons for certain sites and ceremonies. And the lies are helping to create a situation in Mexico where traditional people cannot access their sites and do their ceremonies. How disgusting that INAH and other lying archaeological bodies are involved in depriving Maya and other Mexicans of their own history and culture!
                  And consistently traditional peoples have asked/demanded that museums and 'collections' return their artifacts, ceremonial objects, writings, etc, that were literally stolen by the imperialists/colonialists.
                  When we talk about 'poverty' it is important to remember that vast stores of Maya 'wealth' are being kept from them.
                  I know an ex-paymaster of INAH who told me that vast warehouses the size of aircraft hangars are full of 'found' artifacts from Mexican cultures. It's not the writers about the Mayan traditions who are the thieves - it's the archaeologists and their mates.
                  At least the writers mentioned are bring much worthy attention and introduction to people who have been desperately wronged, and are still being wronged today!

                  And plenty of the Elders acknowledge that much of the writing and research has helped to open peoples' minds and help the Maya and other tribes in their work to help activate and prepare large numbers of humanity (over the last 20 years) for the shift that is happening. But plenty folk are stuck in their 3-D cynical reality, full of fear and lacking humility. They don't get invited to the ceremonies for obvious reasons!

                  Anyone who actually 'knows' Jose Arguelles and John M J also knows that they have spent many years in Mexico and Guatemala and do actually know alot of traditional Elders and attend many meetings. Information that is important (like the release of the time of Harmonic Convergence, certain sites to visit, initiation and ceremony, etc) has been passed to western writers by the Maya and others. Anyone who knows Jose knows that he is not some wealthy man with all his "proceeds". And where does he suggest that humans are all "done for"? D'uh!

                  But the real point here is that the main comments come from ignorance and envy!
                  Just more fear-mongering folks, and not worth heeding!
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
                    "He has written valid information and is not some new age writer. To suggest he is is pure rubbish!"

                    I guess that depends on how one defines "New Age". By all means, people should read what he's written and listen to what he says and decide for themselves.

                    "The Maya were subject to mass genocide by the Spanish so any suggestion that they are poor now because of their traditions and knowledge is more cheap nonsense. "

                    I agree. That's why I never suggested it.

                    "But the real point here is that the main comments come from ignorance and envy!"

                    I won't deny the envy part. The hyping of 2012, crystal skulls, and the like seems to attract a lot more attention than archaeology, anthropology, history, linguistics, and other academic studies of the ancient and living Maya--including those that draw extensively on knowledge from the Maya themselves and empower their own voices.

                    I think it's an issue of marketing and PR.
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
                    To reconnect to some of the ideas in the other thread, the only way I can accept Jose Arguelles is as an Artist. My impression was, when reading from him or watching a presentation/talk that the Dreamspell and his philosophy is an artistic statement. He isn't pushing a doctrine or a dogma. He's encouraging a change of perception, very wisely, to approach everything as an art of creation; including our lives, our words, our believes.

                    After all, time is rather Art than money.
                    • Unsu...
                       
                      Jose Arguelles is certainly an artist.
                      He is a mythmaker...a creator, a dreamer of the Dreamspell...
                      He does not need to resort to dogma, perhaps because he
                      operates from a point of balance...an inner balance born
                      from the art of creation. He is a person of great depth and
                      wisdom, his approach, his footsteps; leading us to challenge
                      our current perceptions which ultimately have the potential
                      to open up new gateways of creation.


                      <<Leading New Age Authors ADMIT They Make Money From Their 2012 FEAR MONGERING>>

                      One thing that strucks me with the title of this thread is with the use of the word, ADMIT.
                      Where do they ADMIT that they make money from their 2012 'fear mongering'?
                      I would like to see this admittance...

                      DO THEY ADMIT TO THIS?
                      SHOW ME WHERE.

                      Perhaps I should contact Jose Arguelles and all the other mentioned writers of the 2012 writers club
                      and ask them about this so called admittance.

                      That is a loaded title to say the least...but sensationalism and inaccuracy sells.

                      Mordana



              • <<Basically, the part about how if we don't change our consciousness to be more like the Mayas are imagined to have been, we're done for. >>

                i think we are in for serious trouble if we dont change our ways, very serious trouble. You dont have to look at esoteric writings for that like the Mayan to know that, even Jeffry Sachs senoir advisor to the UN and James Martin, Oxford proffesor with a technology background and head of the James Martin Institute are saying this.

                Check out his book "common wealth, economics for a crowded planet" the rapid econimic development of the developing world will put C02 and other huge crisis like water shortages right off the chart, add to that population growth and we have the biggest global crisis that has ever affected humanity. Not that this is all going to happen by 2012 but we have around 20 years to begin serious implemenation of DRASTIC change.

                James Martin (check out the James Martin institute) talks that this century we can create a utopia or quite easily put ourselves back to the dark ages with technology. He says the power of technology has only just begun, but right now we are behaving like a 17 year old whos been given a ferrair for his birthday. He thinks this century is the biggest step in evolution since the single cell first developed over 4 billion years ago.

                Now what the Hopi and Mayans have been saying only serves to underline this.

                But the crucial thing is that we have the power to change, the wise words of a Mayan elder say -

                “"We are the keepers of the Earth. When we truly honor ourselves and our awesome creative power we will again live in a sacred way where we honor all life. “Mayan Elder Hunbatz Men

                Now im not sure if these writers are saying were doomed, if they are i totaly disagree, but if they are saying that if we dont change we are in very very deep trouble, then they are very right.
              • >>Basically, the part about how if we don't change our consciousness to be more like the Mayas are imagined to have been, we're done for.

                That's always struck me as a bit odd, considering how Maya civilization collapsed a thousand years ago and most Mayas today are desperately poor.<<

                A quote from Lawrence Joseph's Apocalypse 2012:

                "Indeed, Jared Diamond's recent book, Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed, depicts the ancient Maya as the case study of what societies ought not to do to the local environment. Diamond methodically presses the argument that the Mayans overfarmed, deforested and overpopulated their land. A 2004 NASA study confirms Diamond's condemnation. Pollen trapped in sediments taken from the area right around Tikal, dating back approximately 1200 years, just before the Mayan civilization's collapse, indicates that trees had almost completely disappeared, replaced by weeds.

                Diamond believes that the population density of the Classic Mayan civilization reached 1500 persons per square mile. That's double the current density , for example, of Rwanda and Burundi, two of the most crowded and troubled nations in Africa. Warfare over scarce resources inevitably broke out, leading to complete societal collapse- a peak population of between 5 million and 14 million in 800 CE tumbled 80 or 90 percent less than a century.

                "We have to wonder why the kings and nobles failed to recognize and solve these seemingly obvious problems undermining their society.Their attention was evidently focused on their short-term concerns of enriching themselves, waging wars, erecting monuments, competing with each other and extracting enough food from the peasants to support these activities. Like most leaders throughout human history, the Maya kings and nobles did not heed long term problems, insofar as they perceived them", writes Diamond.

                The Mayan fall in power, prosperity and population is quite possibly the most drastic any civilization has ever experienced. Does that invalidate their wisdom? It certainly doesn't recommend it, except possibly in the area of catastrophe, which historically they know better than just about anyone else."


                Deja vu?
                • <Deja vu?>

                  yes its like the bit at the end of the matrix, where neo finds out he is the 9th (or whatever number it is) version to reach that point, great civilizations have grown and fallen, do we have what it takes this time to trancsend the pattern ? I think 2012 is just the start of that question though, maybe.

                  sometimes no matter how deep you look at something there will always be an element of mystery.
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
                    pp: Today, 12:24 AM

                    zaman. and here i thought something real, if not vital could be learned
                    j.dude brings us something, but not only with the what, but the HOW.
                    and then the usual bs, but takes far too much, with the usual shallow
                    bickering...sure, sometimes it is fun, but to lose site?
                    once again, beyond humor hour
                    i have seen what the meds and poor diet have done...

                    the weekend has begun early for me
                    damn, friday morn... ok
                    so i got off work early...
                    beer?
                    naw, why tempt with the gateway 'drug' to
                    the hard stuff
                • And to add to the central idea of the whole 2012 thing that we have to change our consciousness; we have to change the way we are living. The change of consciousness happens on a metaphysical level, something that we can't perceive in a material world. However, the consequences of this change will eventually manifest in a physical world as well. This is a process, actually, a long process that may take up decades...But the change must be RADICAL.

                  And this is why some of the conspiracy theories have ground; the current chaos is more than good for the ruling financial elite. The bigger the chaos the more they can fish. The real shift is when we can realize our detachment from the material world-we don't need "energy" anymore to live.
    • <<greatest American president of All Times: George Bush ("Weapons Of Mass Destruction" and "Terrorists" spelled with a German accent). >>

      very much with you on that one Auton, i think this war on terror thing has been extremely destructive to global harmoney and the energy knocking about the thousands of millions on this planet, and sadly i feel we have yet to see the full extent of that destructivness, as if 1 million iraqis wasnt bad enough.
    • "I promise I will read a book from Daniel Pinchbeck as soon as it will be available from a library or friend."

      In other words, you'll deny him the opportunity to make more money off of you.

      Very wise move, Auton. Very wise, indeed.
      • oh come on Hoopes, everyone needs money, how would you like it if your University asked you to work for free ?

        I think the question of whether Daniel Pinchbeck has got some good stuff to say is a different matter, i know a lot of people have recomended i read him.
        • "oh come on Hoopes, everyone needs money, how would you like it if your University asked you to work for free ?"

          Sure, everyone NEEDS money, but some deserve it much more than others.

          I think the salaries of university professors, graduate students, and teachers in general reflect the fact that they *are* willing to do a lot of hard work for free.
          • <<I think the salaries of university professors, graduate students, and teachers in general reflect the fact that they *are* willing to do a lot of hard work for free. >>

            yeah i agree with that, i certainly cant comment much about these authors as i havnt read them, others here disagree with you, well i dont know, one day quite soon ill read them.

            But with Gibran, i cant agree at all, it is an ENORMOUS risk for an artist to dedicate his life to writing, you risk poverty, and its only the exceptional minority who succed, unlike many safe jobs. And if a writer has managed to inspire people with almost as many books than the bible has sold, id say he is worth his weight in dimanonds if not gold.
      • Honestly, what is this problem with earning money?

        Is your truth uniquely more truthful and more valuable?

        I do not understand.

        Seems judgmental to me.

        Please explain...
        • "Honestly, what is this problem with earning money?"

          Problem? Who says there's a problem? Well, some see a problem with Al Gore (but not me, and anyway that's another thread...)

          I do think that when people are selling something, there are extra reasons for the buyer to beware. However, that's probably also true when people are giving away something for free.

          (BTW, all of the information, opinions, and entertainment you get from me here comes free of charge.)

          I think there is a problem when all "knowledge" and "information" is assumed to be of equal value.
          • "(BTW, all of the information, opinions, and entertainment you get from me here comes free of charge.) "

            If only that were true...

            There is a cost to potentially inaccurate propaganda emanating across the universe.

            On one level you are sifting it out.

            On another level you are creating masses of doubt on your own.

            Why not state only what you are certain of as your researched opinion?

            The trees are falling, pay attention, please!
  • Here's a bit of historical trivia about hoaxes (like the crystal skulls and stuff about 2012). There's a brief article in the Wikipedia (of all places) about the Cardiff Giant, one of the greatest archaeological hoaxes in American history:

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardiff_Giant

    It was actually George Hull (creator of this hoax) and not P.T. Barnum who said, "There's a sucker born every minute."

    www.historybuff.com/library/...rnum.html

    However, P.T. Barnum had such success exhibiting a fake of the Cardiff Giant (actually a hoax of a hoax!) that it's fitting that a myth has emerged attributing the quote to him!

    Note that the Cardiff Giant was created to punk Creationists. Something tells me December 21, 2012 will present a monumental opportunity to punk New Agers...

    Better watch out!
    • You post straight from both head, heart and typing fingers Hoopes,
      much kudos to you for that!

      What do you think - is there any substance whatsoever to the whole
      2012 thing?


      • "As an archaeologist who has excavated Aztec sites and written books on the Aztecs, I was disappointed in your story on crystal skulls. The museum curators you interviewed proved that several phony-looking crystal skulls the size of footballs are indeed fakes. But they have not shown that the more abundant small crystal skulls are also forgeries. My colleagues and I have excavated many small ritual objects and jewelry of rock crystal at Aztec sites. Although none of the small crystal skulls now in museums come from documented excavations, I consider it extremely likely that they were indeed made by the Aztecs. Indiana Jones probably believes this also".

        -- Michael E. Smith

        www.public.asu.edu/~mesmith9/
        publishingarchaeology.blogspot.com/2008/05/blog-post.html
      • "What do you think - is there any substance whatsoever to the whole 2012 thing?"

        I think there is just enough substance--and just enough *lack* of substance--to make it the core of a great mythology

        I prophesize that the most incredible stories about "the whole 2012 thing" will not emerge until after December 21, 2012.

        This will be because the past is far more malleable than the future.

        I anticipate a widespread experience of collective false memory syndrome similar to what has been at the heart of other mythologies and world religions.

        What's most interesting to me is not WHAT people choose to believe, but WHY.
        • This I believe: .....I used to be interested in the why but it only goes in circles. Its like I reasoned about reasons because it was reasonably reasonable. Plus I'm not sure if anyone else has noticed this but when you use reason everything must be explained in detail and then as the whys lead to more whys they eventually end up back to either "I don't know" or the statement..."well this is what i believe and several others believe this too." I usually find this statement to be very illogical because how is one to know how many actually believe in this same thing as if we are to trust that our media outlets are sharing with us relevant data about mass belief. And that goes for newspapers, book publishers ect. I guess one of my points here would be that these authors may be making money from the sales of their books but I don't hear this stuff on mainstream media outlets with all the control of communication. Also I could speculate that the increase in sales of such books is partly a result from the distrust in mass media outlets created by the obvious neglect of power by those who take part in these systems. but of course this is only my personal belief....

          on a side note I would suggest using such prefaces when communicating because I also believe that without it everything you speak comes out sounding like your preaching a gospel from your own bible of eternal truths...this I believe.
          • "Also I could speculate that the increase in sales of such books is partly a result from the distrust in mass media outlets created by the obvious neglect of power by those who take part in these systems. but of course this is only my personal belief..."

            I think you're on the right track. If Bill Clinton's dicking around with Monica Lewinsky wasn't enough to foster distrust (and/or disgust), then the inanity of the Bush Administration sure has been. It would be interesting to see if there's a correlation between acceptance of pseudoscience and loss of faith in centralized authority. For example, a big resurgence of interest in New Age stuff corresponded closely to the Nixon presidency (1969–1974) and especially the Watergate scandal (1972-1974).

            Ignatius Donnelly's "Atlantis: The Antediluvian World" (1882) and "Ragnarok: The Age of Fire and Gravel" (1883) were both published during the presidency of Chester A. Arthur who (as LBJ did with JFK) became president when James Garfield was assassinated, while Helena Blavatsky's "Secret Doctrine" (1888) appeared during the subsequent first-time presidency of Grover Cleveland, who failed to be re-elected for a second term until after he'd lost to Benjamin Harrison.
        • Yes. This is how it's always been done. What we can do, is to continue the dialogue,
          between ourselves, with and within ourselves, and between ourselves and the larger
          environment and the universe. Art, science, culture, civilization as integral parts of
          this individual and collective inquiry.

          Yes, the Why, agree. It's a bit interesting with the Whereto as well, right?

          In my more optimistic moments, I usually think Why not,
          as well...
          • Yeah, john! Exactly! Well put.
            • I thought about this thread a lot yesterday while working in the garden. This place hardly had a garden at all, most pathetic agro scene i've ever seen for a bunch of rural hippies. I'm living at starroots ranchero, on milky way lane so i knew it was not going to be big on the mundane plane. The tiny little garden is chockablock with bigass quartz rocks that i'm hauling out. They were the put there on purpose by this crazy guy who used to live here as way oversize borders for beds and walkways. His intent was to focus all that crystal energy and make the vegetables all cosmic. All sod and big rocks when i started, and a couple of nice little wooden beds that two of the guys here maintained last year. No functional deer fence though, so mostly just went to feed them. I took up a collection for a good 7.5 ft high fence, and have been putting it up. Took up a collection for a load of compost too. Fukabunchadamnedrocks.

              I think there's something to 2012 because of experiences i had on harmonic convergence. Big changes are in motion! We are being helped! I think that too much emphasis has been placed on lore and complicated systems. This is a natural process. We are a part of it. I think our task is largely to get our egos out of the way and just let it happen, and that if we wholeheartedly attend to whatever it is in front of us that needs our attention, it'll all work out. I'm going to proceed on that assumption.
              • LOL

                Fri, May 23, 2008 - 12:27 PM
                fun E U shood men shun HARMONIK KONVERGENCE wil......hears thee Re: sponse eye just posted over on "al gore makes money off global warming" thread:

                2 kon-kurrent scenario's N that A) having "al gore" seam az tho 2 B A "false profit" eye meen prophet, witch wood start yet another stalling mekanizm among thee masses i.e. D bate on global warming....."duz it even exist?"......"hue manz arent fucking up thee earth"......etc etc.....when N actuallity there R detraMENTAL affex occuring dew 2 "hue man error", and B) az jose put it N thee back ov thee 2nd printing ov thee mayan faktor, 1996, thee "HARMONIK KONVERGENCE" energetik aktivayshun wave that thee earth passed thru N 1986-87 did knot N fakt have thee "natural affekt" on thee mass hue man genetik material/DNA/RNA, thus a "pre awakening" did knot occur, az preperayshuns and such knead 2 B made pre seeding this "2012" ov witch sew men E speek.....az jose puts it, quite thee oppozite occured........hue manz took another direkshun per outside N fluence from thee powerz that B N thee material/teknologikal/monetary realmz.......

                sew penetrayting/N filtrayting thee "starseeds" az well az everyone else waz E Z.........thee "false Re: bellion" spoken ov N thee ESOTERIC AGENDA iz just that.......a seaming "Re: bellion" that iz nothing moor that a mutated version ov "baylon", B it "knew age", "hippies", "burningman", "punk rock", "greanpeace", etc etc etc..........

                thee powerz that B have played/R playing a rather krude game ov Re: verse Re: verse Re: verse psykology on thee masses ov gaia meanwhile thee NRG'z R XLR8ing and nothing iz truly getting dun......kuz all thee knew agerz and such wanna make money off their "gifts" kuz this reality thus far still dick tates that "one must earn thee right 2 live"...........

                sted E az she growz

                and on with thee show

                XLR8!!!!!!!

                0mega13
                0ver&#%@()!!!
    • The curiosity of this way of thinking is the denial of the individual's role in the unfoldment...

      In any unfoldment...

      You will indeed be correct, and never know of the options...

      Prove me wrong.

      Prove yourself right.

      It's futile, so why do it?
      • "Prove me wrong.

        Prove yourself right."

        I'm not seeking to prove anything at all. Only to lead fellow travelers on a path to higher enlightenment. You can come along if you like or follow a totally different path. That makes little difference to me (or my bank account).
        • "I'm not seeking to prove anything at all. Only to lead fellow travelers on a path to higher enlightenment. You can come along if you like or follow a totally different path. That makes little difference to me (or my bank account)."

          Thanks for the clarification, I nearly stumbled into your church.

          I beg to differ. You are citing evidence to back up your opinions ravenously.

          State opinions without references and then I would believe this statement.

          True leaders don't ask to be followed!

          I get this sense that what you feel and what you think are totally different things.
          • "State opinions without references and then I would believe this statement."

            Hmm. Sounds as if you're willing to believe authoritative statements that are not backed by any supporting evidence. I wouldn't advise doing that. It can get you into a lot of trouble.

            "True leaders don't ask to be followed!"

            Does it seem as if I'm asking? I'm not.

            "I get this sense that what you feel and what you think are totally different things."

            Isn't that normal? I think it's also known as the difference between inuition and intellect. Both are valuable but both can lead to errors. I both feel and think that what's best is a balance between the two.
            • Well it's a first for me.

              I now have been witness to a truly lost cause.

              I never thought I would say these words.

              Thank you for liberating me from one final, tenuous belief.

              Believing is indeed seeing.

              A person who ceaselessly takes an opposing position in order not to confront their own weeds.

              There is no interest in accuracy at all is there? Merely the avoidance of the self.

              Which begs the question, "Why live?"

              My biggest question in life is now clear.

              Not everyone is salvageable.
              • "There is no interest in accuracy at all is there?"

                Are you saying that belief is the only way to know something with accuracy? I think the Heisenberg uncertainty principle and quantum mechanics would support that.

                en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unce..._principle

                "Why live?"

                To see what's going to happen next. What's never happened before. What can't be imagined. Why else?
                • "Why else?"

                  Ever other person's opinion on the subject! We all walk a unique path.

                  Reason attempts to obliterate the 'Hero's journey' and replace the masses with a few heroes.

                  What has proof done for anyone except to create more segregation / fragmentation?

                  That is not to say that duality and linearity and reason do not have their place.

                  It's a question of origin. Not everyone starts from the same place?

                  The assumption of a common belief is profoundly arrogant and narcissitically subjective.

                  The idealism that Oneness means we all must think alike is what I am questioning.

                  The aspiration is called mental colonialism

                  It's also called Socialism and we all know how well that works.

                  Socialism is always reborn from refined, intellectual policies. Surprise!

                  Are you guiding others or fooling yourself? This is a question we all must ask.
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.

                    "common sense"

                    Sat, May 24, 2008 - 1:47 PM
                    haz exited stage left....aeons ago.......

                    "The idealism that Oneness means we all must think alike is what I am questioning. "

                    that may B yore, and others, N terpretayshun, however "unified konshussnes" Re: lates 2 what most people R Re: ferring 2 when they use thee term "kommon sense".......universal principles and such, that R just :understood"

                    kurrent hue man dellima haz much 2 dew with thee weigh hue man percepshun haz ben thoroughly kondishuned 2 mispercieve men E "kommon universal principles".....

                    part ov how thee illuminati haz managed such a fine job at such kondishuning ov thee masses iz having people all have N finitely varying "opinions" on "reality", there4 "no one really knows", meanwhile thee powerz that B get away with sum rather grim undertakingz........


                    "The assumption of a common belief is profoundly arrogant and narcissitically subjective. "

                    know, thee "assumpshun" ov a "unfied konshussnes" fully aware ov itself, each other, and its surroundingz, living N acordance with universal principles, iz what we're looking 2 achieve, oar sew eye thought ;;>)))

                    however thee assumpshun that hue manz R thee only hue manz, much less only "N telligent life" N thee multiverse, IZ ARROGANT and narcissitikally subjektive..........az iz allow wing ones fellow man 2 go hungry, homeless, war ridden, etc.......
      • jdude
        why bother?
        yeah, we all need a hobby in which to waste time
        i tried to simplify: e=i x r

        khan suddenly became an electrical engineer...i will never stop laughing at that one
        and hoopes...
        ok, you line up links better than...

        i tried to warn you about the stubborn and the stupid...
        and maybe the crystal skull holds...
        nothing
        damn, now you have 4 friends...
        you speak...clear
        do not bother trying to show the blind
        or was it
        trying to tell the dead
        sorry, meant deaf
        the long weekend
        is waiting
        fun, is only the beginning
        • rogerdude, all my new friends are chicks too!

          This means I'm really spiritual or really gay!

          One more friend and we'll be tied for last place!


          Thanks for the compliments. Nothing came too easy!

          The beauty of dealing with stubborn people is how you feel when you go home.

          I think it was Churchill who said, "The difference between you and me is that I can go home without you."
          • Unsu...
             
            Ha! J'uha & Roger...
            This thread would be the 'deaf poets society' thread if it was not for your humour
            & clear-sightedness.

            ...and these new friends of yours J'uha...these 'chicks' are all
            pretty much sensational...as we said, like attracts like.

            catch you in the wave- where new age authors meet and dispel fear mongering.
            M.
            • Mordana, sensational indeed!

              I was once told that I give my power away.

              Then I realized the power was not mine, it's eternal and it's free.

              The less we impose is the more of the compatible stuff that leaps into existence.

              Now that's sensational!

              Maybe that's what people are afriad to see? What is compatible?

              If you don't like your life change your mind.

              Are the boys listening? Hearing? Or converting everything into objects of 'agazement'?

              Leading New Age Authors ADMIT (how dare they) make money! I think toxic food and big pharma etc. is a whole lot more serious (that the authors make truckloads of money from) than this personal issue thread.


              Kristalina has the following link on her page.

              It's a reminder not to be so serious and to pay attention.

              www.youtube.com/watch
          • jdude
            damn, at least humor hour not only continues but now
            is better than ever.
            won't even bother to ask if you drink
            something happened along the way
            and can you imagine if everybody, actually had a vote
            in/on how to run the world?
            einstein/chaos probably pegged it rite

            peter serono?
            said to be the expert/the crystal skulls
            i have never been so bored in my life


            just wait till you get a thousand friends or so
            me, i won't have more
            than
            six
            after another beer i may just run your profile
            naw

            so much potential, here and there
            hope to see you open up a bit
            more on the crystal skulls

            i can't stop...
            one more and we'll be tied for last

            you got anything against strip bars?


            • rogerdude, I appreciate your honestly immensely.

              You just lay it out there.

              Best advice I ever received. "Pay attention!"

              If there is something you do not like change your mind.

              Do I drink? Gallons of water, juice and an occasional few rounds of alcohol.

              Alcohol supresses and lowers your voltage.

              Try chocolate, cayenne pepper, young fruit, raw veggies and sex instead!

              When you feel better, the eyes get clear.

              My bio, one day I'll have one of those.

              Strip bars are awful. The occasional beauty belongs to someone else!
              • dj: aka doc j, aka j'uha
                >>>"Pay attention!"

                If there is something you do not like change your mind.
                'but that does not mean the feelings can be changed'

                Do I drink? Gallons of water, juice and an occasional few rounds of alcohol.


                'hopefully, not "plain" alcohol'

                Alcohol supresses and lowers your voltage.
                'yes, but if you know what you're doing, the amperage can be increased' flo vs force

                Try chocolate, cayenne pepper, young fruit, raw veggies and sex instead!
                'naw, porn works. but of course not by itself; i used to post over at aphrodisiacs tribe but...i think most get the pix'

                When you feel better, the eyes get clear.
                'the eyes too clear/feel way too good....manic in a bottle?
                better than all the sex, drugs, etc all put together, and all at...once

                My bio, one day I'll have one of those.
                'i can't wait. i forgot if manjo even has one'

                Strip bars are awful. The occasional beauty belongs to someone else!
                'speak for yourself; i have experts here...well
                lap dances were probably not 2 bucks and some change
                but he don't drink cheap
                me and elo do...
                • "If there is something you do not like change your mind.
                  'but that does not mean the feelings can be changed' "

                  Everything is a feeling before it is a thought. Change your mind change the feeling.

                  Example, I choose to see my miserable childhood as a lesson rather than a punishment.

                  Once you believe this from the next down, trust me, you feel different.


                  "'yes, but if you know what you're doing, the amperage can be increased' flo vs force "

                  I have no idea what this means lol.
                  One sip, two deep breaths, four toe taps and hee haw to up the amp?

                  No voltage no amp!


                  "'naw, porn works. but of course not by itself; i used to post over at aphrodisiacs tribe but...i think most get the pix' "

                  Boo, the energy spent on porn is for others too!

                  It's drugs for the other head!

                  The greatest contribution you can give yourself and others....is yourself.


                  "'speak for yourself; i have experts here...well "

                  Experts who have perfected what? lol

                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
                    Everything is a feeling before it is a thought. Change your mind change the feeling.
                    >>you are a very very smart dude, but this one...way off base. so you got it backwards or maybe just another clever
                    code<<

                    Example, I choose to see my miserable childhood as a lesson rather than a punishment.
                    Once you believe this from the next down, trust me, you feel different.
                    >>>I choose to see my miserable childhood/ just re: it could have been worse<<<

                    "'yes, but if you know what you're doing, the amperage can be increased' flo vs force "
                    I have no idea what this means lol.
                    One sip, two deep breaths, four toe taps and hee haw to up the amp?
                    No voltage no amp!
                    >>>you posted: low voltage; less with alcohol. lost where i put the other post about 'alchemizing the alcohol'
                    only a fool would drink foolishly: plain alcohol
                    plus: i was trying to demonstrate simple ohms law to you: e=ixr
                    sorry, could have meant manjo
                    whether we talk of it at basic or phd level, i believe i can cover the bases
                    and that was before i learned of tesla technology
                    physics, no matter how good of an education they 'give' you
                    next

                    "'naw, porn works. but of course not by itself; i used to post over at aphrodisiacs tribe but...i think most get the pix' "

                    Boo, the energy spent on porn is for others too!

                    It's drugs for the other head!
                    yeah, but it works better than it plays...
                    especially with no time to be wasted

                    The greatest contribution you can give yourself and others....is yourself.


                    "'speak for yourself; i have experts here...well "

                    Experts who have perfected what? lol
                    strip bars: between fantasy and fact? no, that was another post
                    oh oh. dont' make me go wake him up
                    on a saturday nite, long long ago, i saw the pot being stirred...but not in the rite way?
                    i shall not name this person but his name starts with h
                    damn, too late to erase
                    it was then i tabled the ultimate...
                    lap dances...as i gave him too much credit
                    as i reduced to singular
                    hell, maybe he just cashed his paycheck
                    i don't know
                    at least he still has a 'job'
  • while we are on the subject of money, i came across this today -

    "They deem me mad because I will not sell my days for gold; and I deem them mad because they think my days have a price."

    kahlil gibran, بن ميخائيل بن سعد

    this does not mean of course gold has no value
    • Interesting that you quote Khalil Gibran. He's certainly appropriate to this thread, as explained in this telling January 2008 article about him:

      Prophet Motive: The Kahlil Gibran phenomenon, by Joan Acocella
      www.newyorker.com/arts/crit...s_acocella

      "'The Prophet' started fast—it sold out its first printing in a month—and then it got faster, until, in the nineteen-sixties, its sales sometimes reached five thousand copies a week. It was the Bible of that decade. But the book’s popularity should not be laid entirely at the door of the hippies. 'The Prophet' was a hit long before the sixties (it made good money even during the Depression), and sales after that decade have never been less than healthy—a record all the more impressive in that it is due almost entirely to word of mouth. Apart from a brief effort during the twenties, 'The Prophet' has never been advertised. Presumably in honor of this commercial feat, Everyman’s Library has now brought out 'Kahlil Gibran: The Collected Works' ($27.50), with a pretty red binding and a gold ribbon for a bookmark. While most people know Gibran only as the author of 'The Prophet,' he wrote seventeen books, nine in Arabic and eight in English. The Everyman’s volume contains twelve of them.

      "The critics will no doubt greet it with the same indifference they have shown Gibran ever since his death, in 1931. Even his publisher, Alfred A. Knopf, brushed him off. When Knopf was asked, in 1965, who the audience for 'The Prophet' was, he replied that he had no idea. 'It must be a cult,' he said—an ungrateful response from the man to whom 'The Prophet' had been a cash cow for more than forty years."
      • <<an ungrateful response from the man to whom 'The Prophet' had been a cash cow for more than forty years." >>

        so this person, who i would bet my life has far less to day to us than Gibran, thinks Gibrans motive was to make money. How on earth someone can read his words and think that, i can see then they have a soul as barran as rocks in the desert.

        Gibran certainly knew more of poverty Hoopes than id wager you or I -

        Gibran was born in the Christian Maronite town of Bsharri in today's northern Lebanon - at the time, part of the Ottoman Empire. He grew up in the region of Bsharri. His maternal grandfather was a Maronite Catholic priest[2]. His mother Kamila was thirty when Gibran was born; his father, also named Khalil, was her third husband.[3] As a result of his family's poverty, Gibran did not receive any formal schooling during his youth in Lebanon. However, priests visited him regularly and taught him about the Bible, as well as the Syriac and Arabic languages.

        After Gibran's father, a tax collector, went to prison for alleged embezzlement,[1] Ottoman authorities confiscated his family's property. Authorities released Gibran's father in 1894, but the family had by then lost their home. Gibran's mother decided to follow her brother, Gibran's uncle, and emigrated to the United States. Gibran's father remained in Lebanon. Gibran's mother, along with Khalil, his younger sisters Mariana and Sultana, and his half-brother Peter left for New York on June 25, 1895.


        [edit] In the United States

        Khalil Gibran, Photograph by Fred Holland Day, c. 1898The Gibrans settled in Boston's South End, at the time the second largest Lebanese-American community in the United States. His mother began working as a pack peddler, selling lace and linens that she carried from door to door. Gibran started school on September 30, 1895. He had had no formal schooling in Lebanon, and school officials placed him in a special class for immigrants to learn English. Gibran's English teacher suggested that he Anglicise the spelling of his name in order to make it more acceptable to American society. Kahlil Gibran was the result.

        Gibran also enrolled in an art school at a nearby settlement house. Through his teachers there, he was introduced to the avant-garde Boston artist, photographer, and publisher Fred Holland Day,[1] who encouraged and supported Gibran in his creative endeavors. A publisher used some of Gibran's drawings for book covers in 1898.

        At 15, Gibran went back to Lebanon to study at a Maronite-run preparatory school and higher-education institute in Beirut. He started a student literary magazine with a classmate, and was elected "college poet". He stayed there for several years before returning to Boston in 1902. Two weeks before he got back, his sister, Sultana, age 14, died of tuberculosis. The next year, his brother Bhutros died of the same disease, and his mother died of cancer. His sister Marianna then supported Gibran and herself, working at a dressmaker's shop.[1]

        I just dont get this you can only be a good person if your poor. So are way to say any artist is only a good artist if he remans a struglling artist. Or is it the spirtual thing, any person can only be spirtual if they remian poor ? again this is stupid. God has put much abundance on the earth for all of us if we just use it wisely.



        The point of the words i posted above are this. There are far higher things than money. Yet this does not mean money is not important. Just because we can not live without water does not mean water is the most important thing in our life, but it does also mean that water is important. Maslow's hierachy of needs affects us all, though all of us have a different variation on Maslows needs.


  • Speaking of making money (especially from gullibility), has anyone seen the new Indiana Jones movie yet?

    I just got the following heads-up from a former student who saw it today:

    "I was wondering if you had seen the new Indiana Jones movie. If not, I might advise you to stay away from it. I was thinking of walking out half-way through because I was so irritated with all the cultural inaccuracies about Native American cultures throughout. For example, the movie kept mixing up Nazca and Maya cultures, the Andes were referred to as Meso-America, Indiana Jones indicated needing to use ancient Maya writing to translate ancient Nazca writing (!), and the list goes on. Plus the movie is built on the premise that aliens built the Nazca lines and taught agriculture to the Andeans, as if Native Americans were too stupid to figure those things out for themselves. It wasn't as offensive or inaccurate as 'Apocalypto', but the Indiana Jones character is either incredibly stupid, or Steven Spielberg thinks his audience is. Just a fair warning."

    It seems I taught him well!
    • The point is entertainment and misinformation.

      Expecting anything else is well, surprising!

      It's not a documentary...
      • Hi Hoopes - I haven't been reading here in a while...

        [and sorry I haven't read all the posts]

        I feel Calleman, Clow, Pinchbeck, Jenkins and Arguelles are 'love-mongering'

        fear's in the eye of the beholder

        making money does not automatically mean you're a charlatan

        you discern integrity with your heart and mind

        Blessings
        • Unsu...
           
          People (me included) always get upset or sceptical when 'New Age' authors and speakers charge substantial $$$ for their info.
          If we're all One consciousness, and the good 'ol buddies from Sirius Pleiadius are gonna look out for us ANYWAY,
          then why charge a lot of money for this stuff? It makes them seem human, with hungry bellies, and material wishes, and goes against the material they present.

          However, we have to realize that the most important factor of money flow is where it eventually ends up... back in the hands of the rich and filthy, or dispersed among individuals or communities that spend it in an effort to grow an alternative to the Big Business system?
          If these authors make millions of dollars, and buy yachts with that money, I wouldn't support them.
          If on the contrary they invest that money in translations of their material, or flying around giving free lectures, that's a different story.
          I've already watched 6 full length documentaries on Michael Tsarion's webpage, all free for anyone with an internet connection.

          How about someone does some research, and makes a list of who presents what,
          for how much, and where they spend their profit.
          This person would do a lot of good to people who want to be conscious about whom they support,
          and should do it free of charge.
          Anyone?