Could man exist in a non-monetary culture?

topic posted Mon, November 2, 2009 - 8:02 AM by  VidasVeron
Share/Save/Bookmark
Advertisement
Many cultures from ancient religions to new age cults seem to have a common theme, in that one day man will come together in a new age where there will be no need for money or even a barter system… A way of life that all people will have plenty to eat regardless of their status and all sickness will be cured without the need to pay someone to cure everyone.

I’m just wondering if you all think that man can accomplish this feat with his history of greed, lust and hatred that has been bred into his immortal soul from the beginning of time?

Even in a couple of years in 2012, many believe we will be going through not a destruction of man but a transformation that will lead to exactly this type of culture. Do you think man is capable of such a humble existence?
posted by:
VidasVeron
Houston
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • Re: Could man exist in a non-monetary culture?

    Mon, November 2, 2009 - 8:49 AM
    We barter for the needs of our body, shelter, food, water, heat or cold. Comforts I guess without a physical body we wouldn't require a monetary policy. Or if the body was able to evolve in such a way to no longer require those amenities.On a side note why do people believe that they are going to evolve with the body? Its as if we are not willing to recognize that the body does not belong to us. Ashes to ashes dust to dust , it belongs to the earth.
  • Re: Could man exist in a non-monetary culture?

    Mon, November 2, 2009 - 11:31 AM
    I believe the "Regardless of status or rank" thing is only a relatively new concept. Most have had to earn their immortality. One of the original perceptions of the "Holy Man" was and is that he/she had no possessions. No money. So it's not something we have to think of us turning into or something that we can buy. It's a choice that we make this moment. The choice to give up all your worldly goods and go out naked into the world knowing that God will provide.
    Sorry to turn it into a religious experience, but that is after all what religion has been about. It's a DIY concept that has been told by some of the greatest minds in history. How to obtain Immortality.
    To debate the issue is to reject your own possible immortality as I have mine. It was a possibility once and I have given away more things than I can remember, but I still want them and I still have to endure the daily slog of eight hours for "freedom" to be a servant for a further eight in the knowledge that I will be able to sleep for at least five of the hours of night.
    Sad to think that like most of us, the most important thing sold for the possession of money, is our freedom to live.
  • Re: Could man exist in a non-monetary culture?

    Mon, November 2, 2009 - 11:38 AM
    many people always have and still do live without the use of money... and find the idea amusing. ;)

    many people speak of currencies 'collapsing'.. and allow the idea to scare them, allowing themselves to trust only in a dangerous reality with 6.5 billion 'hungry eaters' who threathen them.

    think about it:

    if all people agreed to live without money you would quickly find that people woke up from their nightmares and followed their dreams..
    the 6.5 billion people shine as co-creators and true co-mm-unity is created through co-operation..

    people sometimes think that this is impossible fantasy because.. because.. because???

    8D
  • Re: Could man exist in a non-monetary culture?

    Tue, November 3, 2009 - 9:30 AM
    i think its simplistic to blame money. Man has been living with money for at least 5,000 years.

    The question is, is society subservient to money, or is money subservient to society ? hats what's relevant. And to some extent that answer depends on which country your talking about.

    Money should be made to surve the greater good of scoiety, not the other way around, then money could in fact be a useful tool.

    There is a big problem with much of the world re wealth distribution, but i dont think that is caused by money per say.

    Even if you didn't use money, there would be potential for the powerful to have more than the not so powerful. Its a question of putting community values back into the world to share out wealth better.

    Countries like Sweden are pretty good models for that. And they have money in Sweden by the way.

    this is interesting, a global map rating countries on wealth distribution -

    www.mint.com/blog/trends...istribution/

    some surprises there, like Uganda doing better on wealth distribution that both America and England. doesn't surprise me that much of continental Europe, does better than the UK and America, and that Canada and Australia come off quite good also.

    This, and sustainability are the real issues, and whether work surveys the values of society. For example in countries like Sweden they have lots of laws on working conditions etc, that help ensure the needs of society comes before business.
    • Re: Could man exist in a non-monetary culture?

      Tue, November 3, 2009 - 10:31 AM
      this is even better, ranks country by the "gini" coefficient, which is a measure of wealth distribution within countries -

      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List...e_equality

      you can see that Denmark, Sweden and Japan come off best, USA is ranked

      I do think the wealthy countries in the world should be prepared to slow growth down for 5-10 years whilst we make a shift to green economies, but the likelihood is, as many economist believe, that such a shift would anyway eventually stimulate the economy to further growth.

      USA is ranked about 74th.

      Germany comes out pretty good amongst the big countries, in many ways i think Germany has one of the best governments in the world on a lot of areas, look at there reaction to the Iraq invasion for example, I also like the way the Germans, a lot of them, there companies give them Friday afternoon off work. They say with the Germans, they work hard, but they also play hard - they take there time off work seriously ! and that's how it should be.

      anyway i certainly agree wealth distribution is a big problem in a lot of places, but i dont think money is the culprit, its rather how government structures the economy.

      The most critical thing is if someone is going to tame the beast that is the financial markets.
      • Re: Could man exist in a non-monetary culture?

        Tue, November 3, 2009 - 3:53 PM
        means of exchange, convenience of paper slips and digital tallies over bushels, pecks and trading truckloads of stuff for other truckloads.

        could humans exist in a non-production culture?

        this was the case for many millions of years
        a rather brutal and pastoral life....and still is.

        a growing trend is to exist beyond the means of production and reproduction
        more than a safe and pleasant life
        an unquenchable urge for some to explore the unknown, some even the unknowable.
        the horizon of knowledge and alternatives to status quo are on the move and in a flux of
        going where the end is in question and the means are as changeable as a weather report.
    • Re: Could man exist in a non-monetary culture?

      Tue, November 3, 2009 - 4:08 PM
      I think we there will be a collapse of the current monetary system and the rapid evolution of reality based economy, where trades are made over the internet using a algorithm based on trades of commodities. Real stuff traded for real stuff being the base of the economy and no speculators.

      I worked setting up a LETS system( local electronic trading system) here back in the 80's and it worked pretty well for a number of years. There have been several attempts at local trading systems and currency here over the last couple of decades. None have worked very well......i mean everyone would really rather have cash. If cash crashed, it would be a whole new day for that concept.

      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LETS
    • Re: Could man exist in a non-monetary culture?

      Sat, November 7, 2009 - 10:12 PM
      "There is a big problem with much of the world re wealth distribution, but i dont think that is caused by money per say." ~
      El


      yeah people without means of exchange want disribution
      people with means of exchange, don't.

      but what some really are sick of is those that call shotgun and expect that to be their rightful place for all eternity.
      ft
      earth motto is : first come first serve
      until

      some start shaking sticks and the first comers get served with evictions
      ft
  • Re: Could man exist in a non-monetary culture?

    Thu, November 5, 2009 - 5:09 AM
    Of course. That's the way it's been for millions of years. Money is a relatively knew exchange here on Terra Gaia.

    Vidas: "....man can accomplish this feat with his history of greed, lust and hatred that has been bred into his immortal soul from the beginning of time?"

    I do not agree with that statement. VV.... Since the "begininng of time"? That So does not feel true for me....
    • Re: Could man exist in a non-monetary culture?

      Thu, November 5, 2009 - 5:28 PM
      Yes, of course we can -- humans have lived without money for 99% of our time on Earth. And even a cursory study of anthropology would reveal (contrary to consumerist propaganda) that greed is not "bred into our immortal soul" or an intrinsic human trait. Greed has been cultivated and nurtured in this culture.
  • Mon
    Mon
    offline 7

    Re: Could man exist in a non-monetary culture?

    Sat, November 7, 2009 - 1:12 AM
    Money is merely a great tool for trading: it's compact, hard to copy and it doesn't rot, which comes in handy when you're hoarding tons of precious perishable foods to trade for personal profit.

    Most people struggle and scheme for some dollars in humiliating, boring, dangerous or painful jobs, so that a few 'owners' can swim in the profit without doing anything. Wealth has been funneled to the top this way and kept there over the centuries, protected by religions, laws and possibly the intentional distraction/oppression of the masses.

    So if we are ever to see a world without money, we'll have to take a good look at our definition of 'ownership'...

    Wiki on 'ownership':

    "...Ownership is the state or fact of exclusive rights and control over property, which may be an object, land/real estate or intellectual property. An ownership right is also referred to as title. The concept of ownership has existed for thousands of years and in all cultures. Over the millennia, however, and across cultures what is considered eligible to be property and how that property is regarded culturally is very different. Ownership is the basis for many other concepts that form the foundations of ancient and modern societies such as money, trade, debt, bankruptcy, the criminality of theft and private vs. public property. Ownership is the key building block in the development of the capitalist socio-economic system.

    The process and mechanics of ownership are fairly complex since one can gain, transfer and lose ownership of property in a number of ways. To acquire property one can purchase it with money, trade it for other property, receive it as a gift, steal it, find it, make it or homestead it. One can transfer or lose ownership of property by selling it for money, exchanging it for other property, giving it as a gift, being robbed of it, misplacing it, or having it stripped from one's ownership through legal means such as eviction, foreclosure and seizure. Ownership is self-propagating in that the owner of any property will also own the economic benefits of that property...."

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ownership
    • Re: Could man exist in a non-monetary culture?

      Sat, November 7, 2009 - 11:57 AM
      <Yes, of course we can -- humans have lived without money for 99% of our time on Earth. And even a cursory study of anthropology would reveal (contrary to consumerist propaganda) that greed is not "bred into our immortal soul" or an >

      as much as i have nostalga for the past too, and I dont doubt there were lots of good things about it, you could also as easily say even a cursory study of anthropology would reveal that 99% of our time on Erath was full of violence, murder, starvation, poverty and famine, and aparantly the average life expectancy around 4000 years ago in Britain for example was around 30. Once anthropologist has said that the statistical chance of you dyeing by the hands of another human around 10,000 years ago were 60%, even including the wars last century, in the west, the chances were less than 1 % or something like that.

      Maybe our "greed" hasn't brought us quiet as bad times as we think, its just that quite rightly, we expect more - is that greed ? I dont think so, id call it growth.

      Sure enough, there is a major problem with wealth distribution, but some of you guys are sure throwing the baby out with the bath water.
      • Re: Could man exist in a non-monetary culture?

        Sat, November 7, 2009 - 1:42 PM
        Our history has had a lot of violence, but also a lot of peaceful existence, depending on place and time in our long history.

        I don't really see the connection here between our past violence and the lack of money at the time.
        • Re: Could man exist in a non-monetary culture?

          Sun, November 8, 2009 - 3:24 AM
          <I don't really see the connection here between our past violence and the lack of money at the time.>

          I do, if people are starving and hungry - close to dying, they will be more inclined to use violence to keep them alive - for sure.

          In London if I am walking late at night in a wealthy Area's like Hampstead the chances of me being mugged and stabbed are virtualy nil, if i go to one of the really rough parts late at night, like Hackney, the chances are reasonably high.

          Not that the people in Hampstead are necessary much better people, there just less desperate and angry.

          so of course material desperation comes into it big time.

          <Our history has had a lot of violence, but also a lot of peaceful existence, depending on place and time in our long history. >

          yes but generally the past was far more violent, especially if you compare it to violence and wars now WITHIN the west and new developing countries like China, Brazil and India.

          and your also just talking about violence, that was just one facet of what i was talking about, famines, short life expectancy due to both malnutrition and poor health, were all part of the ancient past.

          Do we want to put the fact that the life expectancy now in the west is 70-80 not 30 as it was 10,000 years ago down to progress or greed ?


          I do think there is quite a bit in the modern world that we have lost from the past, community, excessive differences between wealth now, community aethestics, much of our cities or ugly, but i think thats changing again now, over obsession on material things by some, lack of spirtuality etc.

          But to ingore some of the great leaps of progress over the last 10,000 years or so is also not good.

          To me, we want the best of the modern with the best of the ancient, with a new progressive more community centred approach to modernisation now.

          You see if you "unplug" from "the matrix" - as in the film say, the collective norms of society now, you have to be careful of what you plug into instead, a distorted, unreal over romanticised view of the past is probably just as destructive as the current "matrix" and i say that as someone who has a nostalga about the past myself.

          There are many things i love about ancient Egyptian, Mayan, Chinese, Persian, Celtic, Indian etc, Native America too, but Im also aware that we in our modern western society have lots of advantages to those too.

          Its not a question of a choice between these. Its a question of refocusing some of our priorities in the modern world now.

          We have a saying here in England " the grass is always greener on the other side of the fence" meaning things that are different always look more attractive at first.

Recent topics in "Year 2012"

Topic Author Replies Last Post
Palin 2012 Steven 9 Today, 12:24 AM
What if the 2012 movie really happens? Celestine 41 Yesterday, 11:13 PM
2012 Book & Forum alex 17 Yesterday, 9:53 PM
Valum Votan's Vocabulary Kevin 245 Yesterday, 9:49 PM